<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Luke W. on Amazon&#8217;s Tabbed Interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bokardo.com/archives/amazons-tabbed-interface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/amazons-tabbed-interface/</link>
	<description>Interface Design &#38; UX by Joshua Porter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Izabella Goldenberg</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/amazons-tabbed-interface/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Izabella Goldenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/luke-w-on-amazons-tabbed-interface/#comment-708</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know exactly when they rolled out this latest interface?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know exactly when they rolled out this latest interface?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Franklin</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/amazons-tabbed-interface/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>John Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 16:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/luke-w-on-amazons-tabbed-interface/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>And needless to say...the comment above is pretty much a lower-level encapsulation of your post on Zeldman&#039;s article.    There&#039;s always going to be a tension between &quot;high culture&quot; taxonomy and tag clouds or folskonomies...I&#039;d firmly agree that the place of the thinking man isn&#039;t to resist the latter, necessarily, but to adjust and refine.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And needless to say&#8230;the comment above is pretty much a lower-level encapsulation of your post on Zeldman&#8217;s article.    There&#8217;s always going to be a tension between &#8220;high culture&#8221; taxonomy and tag clouds or folskonomies&#8230;I&#8217;d firmly agree that the place of the thinking man isn&#8217;t to resist the latter, necessarily, but to adjust and refine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Franklin</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/amazons-tabbed-interface/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>John Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 15:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/luke-w-on-amazons-tabbed-interface/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>They sure do have scalability problems, in every sense of that word (both growth and viewport related) - thanks for pointing out Luke&#039;s post.  As to popularity, I&#039;d agree with you.  It&#039;s quite handy when shopping, especially when you are exploring a category of product you&#039;re interested in but don&#039;t know much about.  As I bet you are aware - and as Suroweicki and even the Pentagon have explored - &quot;crowds&quot; tend to know better than individuals.  And although it sometimes seems questionable when applied to, e.g., a CD by Britney Spears, I do think that Amazon&#039;s being open to popularity-influenced design therefore is not a bad thing.  Another successful example of this - maybe without the scaling problems - is Apple.com&#039;s iTunes.  Much of the front page displays content  or options that are crowd driven.  And every search has an Amazon-like &quot;people who bought this music also bought.&quot;  I&#039;ve found it exceptionally useful for learning about, for instance, different covers of the same song.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They sure do have scalability problems, in every sense of that word (both growth and viewport related) &#8211; thanks for pointing out Luke&#8217;s post.  As to popularity, I&#8217;d agree with you.  It&#8217;s quite handy when shopping, especially when you are exploring a category of product you&#8217;re interested in but don&#8217;t know much about.  As I bet you are aware &#8211; and as Suroweicki and even the Pentagon have explored &#8211; &#8220;crowds&#8221; tend to know better than individuals.  And although it sometimes seems questionable when applied to, e.g., a CD by Britney Spears, I do think that Amazon&#8217;s being open to popularity-influenced design therefore is not a bad thing.  Another successful example of this &#8211; maybe without the scaling problems &#8211; is Apple.com&#8217;s iTunes.  Much of the front page displays content  or options that are crowd driven.  And every search has an Amazon-like &#8220;people who bought this music also bought.&#8221;  I&#8217;ve found it exceptionally useful for learning about, for instance, different covers of the same song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

