Comments on: Bottoms-Up! http://bokardo.com/archives/bottoms-up-notes/ A Blog about Social Web Design Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:52:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Prentiss Riddle http://bokardo.com/archives/bottoms-up-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-345 Prentiss Riddle Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:34:48 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/bottoms-up-notes/#comment-345 Very good (paraphrased) quote from Joshua Schacter. I agree, although one can always find second-order wrinkles on it -- Flickr will let me add tags to my friends' images, and even in del.icio.us I may be tagging things for others' purposes because I hope others will see what I tag through "social browsing" or via a del.icio.us-powered sidebar in my blog. One of the great strengths of these simple tools is that people can use them for unanticipated purposes. Very good (paraphrased) quote from Joshua Schacter. I agree, although one can always find second-order wrinkles on it — Flickr will let me add tags to my friends’ images, and even in del.icio.us I may be tagging things for others’ purposes because I hope others will see what I tag through “social browsing” or via a del.icio.us-powered sidebar in my blog. One of the great strengths of these simple tools is that people can use them for unanticipated purposes.

]]> By: bill h-d http://bokardo.com/archives/bottoms-up-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-344 bill h-d Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:21:13 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/bottoms-up-notes/#comment-344 hey Josh...one bad thing (among the many, many good things) about your new "notes" feature is that it pushes your recommended reading list so far below the fold...as a frequent visitor, I don't mind scrolling, but I'd hate for others to miss this valuable and ever-evolving emergent feature :) hey Josh…one bad thing (among the many, many good things) about your new “notes” feature is that it pushes your recommended reading list so far below the fold…as a frequent visitor, I don’t mind scrolling, but I’d hate for others to miss this valuable and ever-evolving emergent feature :)

]]> By: Jay Fienberg http://bokardo.com/archives/bottoms-up-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-343 Jay Fienberg Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:58:06 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/bottoms-up-notes/#comment-343 One the issues with folksonomy in relation to IA is that some of the prominent folks who have talked a lot about folksonomy (and who are somewhat responsibile for hyping it) have described folksonomy as if IA doesn't really exist, or as if IA is really just some left-over practice of the 19th century with no context for foresight or insight into folksonomy. (And, unfortunately, not enough people have read the Polar Bear book!) But, IA is a discipine evolving with the web, and many of the interesting qualities of what is now being called folksonomy have been an evolving part of IA's focus since the beginning of the web. From what I've seen online, I also was surpirsed by the quality of re-action to folksonomy at the IASummit. But, it seems like folks there felt it was the time and place, within the IA community, to talk about IA's ongoing role beyond some of the specific hype around folksonomy. One the issues with folksonomy in relation to IA is that some of the prominent folks who have talked a lot about folksonomy (and who are somewhat responsibile for hyping it) have described folksonomy as if IA doesn’t really exist, or as if IA is really just some left-over practice of the 19th century with no context for foresight or insight into folksonomy. (And, unfortunately, not enough people have read the Polar Bear book!)

But, IA is a discipine evolving with the web, and many of the interesting qualities of what is now being called folksonomy have been an evolving part of IA’s focus since the beginning of the web.

From what I’ve seen online, I also was surpirsed by the quality of re-action to folksonomy at the IASummit. But, it seems like folks there felt it was the time and place, within the IA community, to talk about IA’s ongoing role beyond some of the specific hype around folksonomy.

]]>