<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Controlled Vocabularies and Folksonomies: Why Change is Good.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bokardo.com/archives/change_is_good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/change_is_good/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Social Web Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/change_is_good/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardocom.siteprotect.net/wordpress/?p=41#comment-281</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to imagine how you&#039;d put such a thing into practice on a site that isn&#039;t user-driven, but that theoretically benefit from incorporating a &quot;folksonomy.&quot;

I say that as someone who regularly works on a fairly large and unwieldy site, where user knowledge of internal terminology is a fairly tenuous thing.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to imagine how you&#8217;d put such a thing into practice on a site that isn&#8217;t user-driven, but that theoretically benefit from incorporating a &#8220;folksonomy.&#8221;</p>
<p>I say that as someone who regularly works on a fairly large and unwieldy site, where user knowledge of internal terminology is a fairly tenuous thing&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/change_is_good/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardocom.siteprotect.net/wordpress/?p=41#comment-282</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the question, isn&#039;t it? I&#039;ve been thinking about that a lot, and I have another question: why &lt;em&gt;aren&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; our sites user-driven? 

There are exceptions, of course, and they mostly fall under the guise of &quot;personalization&quot;. I would call Amazon &quot;user-driven&quot;, or at least partially user driven. Many of their recommendations come from the behavior of others on the site, and from my experience their recommendations are very good. 

I don&#039;t have an answer of how to do it on most sites, but here&#039;s an example of how Google could make their site more user driven: take the top 10 topics that I search for, and create a personalized news feed or page out of current related items. Google has known for years what I&#039;m interested in, but they don&#039;t seem to take advantage of it. They know I like Apple Computer, for instance. Why don&#039;t they show me the best deals for one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the question, isn&#8217;t it? I&#8217;ve been thinking about that a lot, and I have another question: why <em>aren&#8217;t</em> our sites user-driven? </p>
<p>There are exceptions, of course, and they mostly fall under the guise of &#8220;personalization&#8221;. I would call Amazon &#8220;user-driven&#8221;, or at least partially user driven. Many of their recommendations come from the behavior of others on the site, and from my experience their recommendations are very good. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have an answer of how to do it on most sites, but here&#8217;s an example of how Google could make their site more user driven: take the top 10 topics that I search for, and create a personalized news feed or page out of current related items. Google has known for years what I&#8217;m interested in, but they don&#8217;t seem to take advantage of it. They know I like Apple Computer, for instance. Why don&#8217;t they show me the best deals for one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris L</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/change_is_good/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardocom.siteprotect.net/wordpress/?p=41#comment-283</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t-- at this point-- see a way for tags to benefit many sites. That&#039;s the promise of the semantic web, but a promise that seems unlikely to ever become real.

On the other hand, any site that uses categorization and classification schemes now-- particularly homegrown ones-- could benefit from at least thinking about how tags might change both production and use. If nothing else it makes one think harder about just how categories and classifications are being made and used.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t&#8211; at this point&#8211; see a way for tags to benefit many sites. That&#8217;s the promise of the semantic web, but a promise that seems unlikely to ever become real.</p>
<p>On the other hand, any site that uses categorization and classification schemes now&#8211; particularly homegrown ones&#8211; could benefit from at least thinking about how tags might change both production and use. If nothing else it makes one think harder about just how categories and classifications are being made and used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
