Comments on: A Glimpse of the Future: Joe Reger’s XML Schema Coolness http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/ A Blog about Social Web Design Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:48:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: mp3 step http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-58874 mp3 step Tue, 26 Dec 2006 11:55:04 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-58874 nikolodean mp3!! Thanks to you!! nikolodean mp3!! Thanks to you!!

]]> By: nikolodean mp3 http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-53830 nikolodean mp3 Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:28:49 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-53830 Hi guys! Merry christamas to you all! Have great holidays and lots of presents!!!!!!! Hi guys!
Merry christamas to you all! Have great holidays and lots of presents!!!!!!!

]]> By: Dimon http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-3293 Dimon Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:37:29 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-3293 And of course, the personalisation features built into BroadVision’s platform also made for some cool demos — even if the customers hardly ever *really* used it because it was complicated. How I’d love to have a BroadVision system (or similar) to run my Web site with now. And of course, the personalisation features built into BroadVision’s platform also made for some cool demos — even if the customers hardly ever *really* used it because it was complicated. How I’d love to have a BroadVision system (or similar) to run my Web site with now.

]]> By: Joe Reger http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-2189 Joe Reger Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:40:49 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-2189 Hi Bob! Great point. Users can drag and drop fields onto the page instead of uploading an XML Schema. That's how most do it. The XML Schema upload is for people who want a jumpstart getting their datablog type going. Once they import the schema they'll still probably drag and drop customize the layout to do what they need it to do. Best, Joe Hi Bob! Great point. Users can drag and drop fields onto the page instead of uploading an XML Schema. That’s how most do it. The XML Schema upload is for people who want a jumpstart getting their datablog type going. Once they import the schema they’ll still probably drag and drop customize the layout to do what they need it to do. Best, Joe

]]> By: Bob http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-1584 Bob Thu, 29 Sep 2005 05:31:19 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-1584 I can see why you're excited but this is absolute horrifying to me. I like using user interfaces that were lovingly designed by a human, rather than ones that are generated by a script based on a schema. This is exactly the kind of stuff that programmers will put up with because it's cool, even though the user experience is many knotches below what it should be. I can see why you’re excited but this is absolute horrifying to me. I like using user interfaces that were lovingly designed by a human, rather than ones that are generated by a script based on a schema.

This is exactly the kind of stuff that programmers will put up with because it’s cool, even though the user experience is many knotches below what it should be.

]]> By: Jeff Watkins http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-1491 Jeff Watkins Fri, 09 Sep 2005 20:20:36 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/joe-reger-xml-schema/#comment-1491 After my recent <a href="http://metrocat.org/nerd/2005/09/whats-wrong-with-movable-type" rel="nofollow">upgrade horror story</a>, I've been giving a lot of thought to what makes a really good blogging system. Back when I worked for BroadVision, I really liked having the option of mixinig different content types in the database. So long as they had properties in common, I could deal with them in aggregate. And of course, the personalisation features built into BroadVision's platform also made for some cool demos -- even if the customers hardly ever *really* used it because it was complicated. How I'd love to have a BroadVision system (or similar) to run my Web site with now. And the entire system configuration was kept in text files, which made migration between servers a dream by comparison to systems like Movable Type and WordPress. On the other hand, you need real money for something like that. After my recent upgrade horror story, I’ve been giving a lot of thought to what makes a really good blogging system.

Back when I worked for BroadVision, I really liked having the option of mixinig different content types in the database. So long as they had properties in common, I could deal with them in aggregate.

And of course, the personalisation features built into BroadVision’s platform also made for some cool demos — even if the customers hardly ever *really* used it because it was complicated. How I’d love to have a BroadVision system (or similar) to run my Web site with now.

And the entire system configuration was kept in text files, which made migration between servers a dream by comparison to systems like Movable Type and WordPress.

On the other hand, you need real money for something like that.

]]>