<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popularity vs. Quality: Is the Long Tail Full of Crap?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bokardo.com/archives/long-tail-full-of-crap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/long-tail-full-of-crap/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Social Web Design</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vitaly Friedman</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/long-tail-full-of-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitaly Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 19:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/113/#comment-740</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Joshua for a great reference. I am willing to read both articles - as soon as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Joshua for a great reference. I am willing to read both articles - as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud Gibson</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/long-tail-full-of-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 02:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/113/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Another way to think of the long tail is in terms of group participation.  Think of any public setting.  Is the fact that only a few people participate an indication that they are the best?  Or simply the most assertive?  Or simply chosen by some process?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another way to think of the long tail is in terms of group participation.  Think of any public setting.  Is the fact that only a few people participate an indication that they are the best?  Or simply the most assertive?  Or simply chosen by some process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
