<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Flash vs. Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bokardo.com/archives/more-flash-vs-ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/more-flash-vs-ajax/</link>
	<description>Interface Design &#38; UX by Joshua Porter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: M Saleh EG [dotone]</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/more-flash-vs-ajax/#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>M Saleh EG [dotone]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/more-flash-vs-ajax/#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>CM, that&#039;s not true, with Flex and Flash forms you can actualy have back button support since it is asynchronous with browser events!

no caching? it&#039;s compiled! It don&#039;t need to be cached. Even if needed, since it is binary the server caches it anyways. 

I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve read my take on &lt;a href=&quot;http://dotone.login.ae/article/ajax-vs-flash-round-2-arena-web20-fight&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AJAX vs. Flash&lt;/a&gt; since I&#039;m running a relatively new blog. 

My take in 2 rounds, I&#039;d relate &lt;a href=&quot;http://dotone.login.ae/article/ajax-vs-flash-round-2-arena-web20-fight&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;round2&lt;/a&gt; of the article to this entry.

In all the cases I&#039;m no biased to any of the sides but I don&#039;t think AJAX beats Flash either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CM, that&#8217;s not true, with Flex and Flash forms you can actualy have back button support since it is asynchronous with browser events!</p>
<p>no caching? it&#8217;s compiled! It don&#8217;t need to be cached. Even if needed, since it is binary the server caches it anyways. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve read my take on <a href="http://dotone.login.ae/article/ajax-vs-flash-round-2-arena-web20-fight" rel="nofollow">AJAX vs. Flash</a> since I&#8217;m running a relatively new blog. </p>
<p>My take in 2 rounds, I&#8217;d relate <a href="http://dotone.login.ae/article/ajax-vs-flash-round-2-arena-web20-fight" rel="nofollow">round2</a> of the article to this entry.</p>
<p>In all the cases I&#8217;m no biased to any of the sides but I don&#8217;t think AJAX beats Flash either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CM Harrington</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/more-flash-vs-ajax/#comment-2161</link>
		<dc:creator>CM Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/more-flash-vs-ajax/#comment-2161</guid>
		<description>Very good article, and I agree, totally. His main point is if you want a truly interactive, immersive experience (games and similar), Flash is your only option. However, if you are text/image/information based, Flash isn&#039;t necessarily the best tool, due to all the problems inherent when you embed what is basically a mini-environment into a web page (no back button, no status bar changes, no JAWS support, no default selecting/copying of text/images/links, no bookmarking, a larger footprint, no caching, etc)

One thing that struck me as odd. He mentioned that no one has yet added sound to an AJAX interface. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve seen one either. However, there is nothing that says embedded files can&#039;t be requested and triggered by user events. Perhaps there hasn&#039;t yet been a need to have audio feedback in an AJAX app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article, and I agree, totally. His main point is if you want a truly interactive, immersive experience (games and similar), Flash is your only option. However, if you are text/image/information based, Flash isn&#8217;t necessarily the best tool, due to all the problems inherent when you embed what is basically a mini-environment into a web page (no back button, no status bar changes, no JAWS support, no default selecting/copying of text/images/links, no bookmarking, a larger footprint, no caching, etc)</p>
<p>One thing that struck me as odd. He mentioned that no one has yet added sound to an AJAX interface. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen one either. However, there is nothing that says embedded files can&#8217;t be requested and triggered by user events. Perhaps there hasn&#8217;t yet been a need to have audio feedback in an AJAX app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

