Comments on: O’Reilly answers What is Web 2.0? http://bokardo.com/archives/oreilly-answers-what-is-web-20/ A Blog about Social Web Design Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:08:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Mashable* http://bokardo.com/archives/oreilly-answers-what-is-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1609 Mashable* Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:21:48 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/oreilly-answers-what-is-web-20/#comment-1609 <strong>Tim O’Reilly on What is Web 2.0?</strong> Tim O’Reilly has just posted what will no doubt become a seminal article on the definition Web 2.0. If you’re still struggling to understand all this Web 2.0 stuff (and who isn’t?) this should clear things right up. Check it out! ... Tim O’Reilly on What is Web 2.0?

Tim O’Reilly has just posted what will no doubt become a seminal article on the definition Web 2.0. If you’re still struggling to understand all this Web 2.0 stuff (and who isn’t?) this should clear things right up. Check it out!
…

]]> By: Josh http://bokardo.com/archives/oreilly-answers-what-is-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1608 Josh Sun, 02 Oct 2005 11:20:47 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/oreilly-answers-what-is-web-20/#comment-1608 Andrew, you didn't follow because neo-classic isn't even a noun. (that doesn't stop me from using it all the time, though). But I used it because I thought this would be the start of something new, which isn't exactly a revival...per se. Andrew, you didn’t follow because neo-classic isn’t even a noun. (that doesn’t stop me from using it all the time, though). But I used it because I thought this would be the start of something new, which isn’t exactly a revival…per se.

]]> By: Andrew http://bokardo.com/archives/oreilly-answers-what-is-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1604 Andrew Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:53:24 +0000 http://bokardo.com/archives/oreilly-answers-what-is-web-20/#comment-1604 Why do you say "neo" classic? That means it's reviving something already considered classic. I'm not sure I follow. Why do you say “neo” classic? That means it’s reviving something already considered classic. I’m not sure I follow.

]]>