<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pew Study: 28% of Online Americans are Taggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Social Web Design</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: NXTblog - The blog of NXTbook Media &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tagging - The Least You Need to Know</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-110497</link>
		<dc:creator>NXTblog - The blog of NXTbook Media &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tagging - The Least You Need to Know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-110497</guid>
		<description>[...] A new report from Pew/Internet says that the practice of &#8220;tagging&#8221; is now used by 28% of Internet users. Though the terminology used by the questions has (rightfully) led some to question the results, the numbers aren&#8217;t really that important. Tagging works for Internet users and the reason is pretty simple (emphasis added): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A new report from Pew/Internet says that the practice of &#8220;tagging&#8221; is now used by 28% of Internet users. Though the terminology used by the questions has (rightfully) led some to question the results, the numbers aren&#8217;t really that important. Tagging works for Internet users and the reason is pretty simple (emphasis added): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kin Lane</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-89998</link>
		<dc:creator>Kin Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-89998</guid>
		<description>I find that even most fairly tech savvy users may know what tagging is, but do not actively participate.  

I doubt that most people truly understand tagging even though they say they know what it is.  They recognize the word.  Not necessarily the meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that even most fairly tech savvy users may know what tagging is, but do not actively participate.  </p>
<p>I doubt that most people truly understand tagging even though they say they know what it is.  They recognize the word.  Not necessarily the meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; From Bokardo - Pew Study: 28% of Online Americans are Taggers - My Web Design Blogs</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-87339</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; From Bokardo - Pew Study: 28% of Online Americans are Taggers - My Web Design Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-87339</guid>
		<description>[...] In a Tagging Report released just yesterday, this number from the Pew Internet and American Life Project is astounding. 28% of online folks have tagged content (U.S) At first glance this number seems extremely high. Over 1/4 of online Americans have tagged content? This is way more than the single digit %s (or lower) that [&#8230;] Read more&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a Tagging Report released just yesterday, this number from the Pew Internet and American Life Project is astounding. 28% of online folks have tagged content (U.S) At first glance this number seems extremely high. Over 1/4 of online Americans have tagged content? This is way more than the single digit %s (or lower) that [&#8230;] Read more&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fővonalas címkézés at doransky</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-85083</link>
		<dc:creator>Fővonalas címkézés at doransky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-85083</guid>
		<description>[...] lenne a mai internet és a használat terjedése ezt tökéletesen bizonyítja.     Linkterbe velem &#124; Iratkozz fel a doransky.hu-ra &#124; Igen, van hírlevélis. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lenne a mai internet és a használat terjedése ezt tökéletesen bizonyítja.     Linkterbe velem | Iratkozz fel a doransky.hu-ra | Igen, van hírlevélis. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Szuc</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-82319</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Szuc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-82319</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"To categorize means to place in a category. (it can also mean to create a new category and place in that). To tag means to apply a tag."&lt;/i&gt;

Suspect a part of this is also about &lt;strong&gt;"contribution"&lt;/strong&gt; - there is a nice warm and fuzzy feeling to write, tag, upload or email something. You feel part of something.

Tagging is another piece of this puzzle.

What other functions make a person feel like they are contributing? AND What is the positive result of this? What will we see in the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;To categorize means to place in a category. (it can also mean to create a new category and place in that). To tag means to apply a tag.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Suspect a part of this is also about <strong>&#8220;contribution&#8221;</strong> - there is a nice warm and fuzzy feeling to write, tag, upload or email something. You feel part of something.</p>
<p>Tagging is another piece of this puzzle.</p>
<p>What other functions make a person feel like they are contributing? AND What is the positive result of this? What will we see in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-81869</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-81869</guid>
		<description>I wonder that the rise of blogging and social bookmarking/tagging services explain the high number in this survey. People on the Internet use a specific jargon, and the increase of tagging services could explain the increased familiarity with words like tagging.

The way I see it people use first tags (keywords) to search for content on Google, and bookmarked a whole page for later (re-)use. But people use more ways to tag content these days hence when you would do a survey "people could mistake tagging for all these actions (bookmarking, searching, tagging on flickr, etc. ...)

I do believe tagging is part of a folksonomy, and categories are still more like partial to taxonomies. Though the whole action of tagging content are actions similar to categorising stuff as well (as indicated by Jay!). But I believe there is a small difference in context.
Tags need to be in a mostly plural from and describe the content eg. river water boat, and categories (are more higher in the hierarchy) eg boating, marine.

Just my idea ...
 
when using good tags that are concise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder that the rise of blogging and social bookmarking/tagging services explain the high number in this survey. People on the Internet use a specific jargon, and the increase of tagging services could explain the increased familiarity with words like tagging.</p>
<p>The way I see it people use first tags (keywords) to search for content on Google, and bookmarked a whole page for later (re-)use. But people use more ways to tag content these days hence when you would do a survey &#8220;people could mistake tagging for all these actions (bookmarking, searching, tagging on flickr, etc. &#8230;)</p>
<p>I do believe tagging is part of a folksonomy, and categories are still more like partial to taxonomies. Though the whole action of tagging content are actions similar to categorising stuff as well (as indicated by Jay!). But I believe there is a small difference in context.<br />
Tags need to be in a mostly plural from and describe the content eg. river water boat, and categories (are more higher in the hierarchy) eg boating, marine.</p>
<p>Just my idea &#8230;</p>
<p>when using good tags that are concise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-81788</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-81788</guid>
		<description>Excellent point, Jay. Tags can be anything, and are only sometimes categories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point, Jay. Tags can be anything, and are only sometimes categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Fienberg</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-81774</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Fienberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-81774</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The funny thing is, that tagging is a special form of categorization by users. It’s nothing more.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Tagging can be something "less" as well: tagging also can be a special form of naming by users. And, tagging also can be a special form of describing by users.

Many free tagging systems present users with three entry fields in a row:

&lt;strong&gt;title:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;description:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;keywords:&lt;/strong&gt;

And, the keywords / tags often end up being a variant of either the title, the description, or both. In these cases, the tags are less like categories and more like names.

On the other hand, people specifically categorize things through naming and description as well, e.g., sometimes people think that using category labels in titles and/or descriptions is a form of categorization. 

For example, when someone puts an ad on craigslist and titles the ad: "free guitar available in Seattle," they explicitly may assume that people are searching for "categories" like: free, guitar, seattle (or some combination like "free guitar," etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The funny thing is, that tagging is a special form of categorization by users. It’s nothing more.</p></blockquote>
<p>Tagging can be something &#8220;less&#8221; as well: tagging also can be a special form of naming by users. And, tagging also can be a special form of describing by users.</p>
<p>Many free tagging systems present users with three entry fields in a row:</p>
<p><strong>title:</strong><br />
<strong>description:</strong><br />
<strong>keywords:</strong></p>
<p>And, the keywords / tags often end up being a variant of either the title, the description, or both. In these cases, the tags are less like categories and more like names.</p>
<p>On the other hand, people specifically categorize things through naming and description as well, e.g., sometimes people think that using category labels in titles and/or descriptions is a form of categorization. </p>
<p>For example, when someone puts an ad on craigslist and titles the ad: &#8220;free guitar available in Seattle,&#8221; they explicitly may assume that people are searching for &#8220;categories&#8221; like: free, guitar, seattle (or some combination like &#8220;free guitar,&#8221; etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ancestor</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-81769</link>
		<dc:creator>Ancestor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-81769</guid>
		<description>And who did they survey? - The results would be very differant (I imagine) if you surveyed high school kids VS the nice gentlemen and ladies at my mom's senior center ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And who did they survey? - The results would be very differant (I imagine) if you surveyed high school kids VS the nice gentlemen and ladies at my mom&#8217;s senior center ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward T.</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-81713</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/pew-study-28-of-online-americans-have-used-the-internet-to-tag-content/#comment-81713</guid>
		<description>My first reaction is that there is simply no way that 28% of the online community is tagging content in the way that you have been discussing it the past couple of days.  But then I wonder about all those MySpace and Facebook users, all those WoW and SecondLife players, and I pause....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first reaction is that there is simply no way that 28% of the online community is tagging content in the way that you have been discussing it the past couple of days.  But then I wonder about all those MySpace and Facebook users, all those WoW and SecondLife players, and I pause&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
