<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rubel Dumps Microsoft for Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bokardo.com/archives/rubel-dumps-microsoft-for-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/rubel-dumps-microsoft-for-web-20/</link>
	<description>Interface Design &#38; UX by Joshua Porter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard MacManus</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/rubel-dumps-microsoft-for-web-20/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard MacManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/rubel-dumps-microsoft-for-web-20/#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>I pretty much use Gmail full-time now, for many uses. 

Personally I balance the &#039;can&#039;t use offline&#039; argument with all the issues surrounding using desktop apps on multiple computers. I use a few PCs and I don&#039;t often have a need for offline work, because in this broadband world I&#039;m usually connected.

And I&#039;m not so sure that web apps can&#039;t scale - again with increased broadband and more and more storage, what&#039;s to stop them? Bloglines for instance is very scalable now. As is Gmail, Google Maps, etc.

I would however like a web app version of Photoshop! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pretty much use Gmail full-time now, for many uses. </p>
<p>Personally I balance the &#8216;can&#8217;t use offline&#8217; argument with all the issues surrounding using desktop apps on multiple computers. I use a few PCs and I don&#8217;t often have a need for offline work, because in this broadband world I&#8217;m usually connected.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not so sure that web apps can&#8217;t scale &#8211; again with increased broadband and more and more storage, what&#8217;s to stop them? Bloglines for instance is very scalable now. As is Gmail, Google Maps, etc.</p>
<p>I would however like a web app version of Photoshop! <img src='http://bokardo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CM Harrington</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/rubel-dumps-microsoft-for-web-20/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>CM Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/rubel-dumps-microsoft-for-web-20/#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>The problems with web apps are manyfold, not the least of which being the total unsuitability for use off-line. Need to work on the train? Well, you&#039;re out of luck. Also, web application interfaces don&#039;t scale. Backpack, for example, while an interesting showcase for AJAX technologies, chokes when you have a very long list, and attempt to re-order that list. 

Don&#039;t get me wrong, now that people are exploiting AJAX, we&#039;re seeing *much* better web interfaces and applications, but good luck getting me to switch to a web-mail client (fulltime) or a new web-version of Photoshop/Omni Graffle/etc. anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problems with web apps are manyfold, not the least of which being the total unsuitability for use off-line. Need to work on the train? Well, you&#8217;re out of luck. Also, web application interfaces don&#8217;t scale. Backpack, for example, while an interesting showcase for AJAX technologies, chokes when you have a very long list, and attempt to re-order that list. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, now that people are exploiting AJAX, we&#8217;re seeing *much* better web interfaces and applications, but good luck getting me to switch to a web-mail client (fulltime) or a new web-version of Photoshop/Omni Graffle/etc. anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

