<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The danger of social markers made public (more on the Social Graph API)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Social Web Design</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Marks</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-155729</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-155729</guid>
		<description>I'm always a little surprised by how "privacy" sensitive people have gotten.  There seem to be an assumption that everything on the web MUST be anonymous.  And when it isn't, they get paranoid.

If you manage your profile properly, as other have suggested, social marker is a great way to develop your personal brand - without spamming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always a little surprised by how &#8220;privacy&#8221; sensitive people have gotten.  There seem to be an assumption that everything on the web MUST be anonymous.  And when it isn&#8217;t, they get paranoid.</p>
<p>If you manage your profile properly, as other have suggested, social marker is a great way to develop your personal brand - without spamming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transcyberia.info</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-154000</link>
		<dc:creator>transcyberia.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-154000</guid>
		<description>[...] this brewing privacy backlash with mounting signs of social media fatigue and you may start to wonder if, maybe, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this brewing privacy backlash with mounting signs of social media fatigue and you may start to wonder if, maybe, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Portability, Social Graph and Privacy &#8212; mrtopf.de</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153375</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Portability, Social Graph and Privacy &#8212; mrtopf.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153375</guid>
		<description>[...] reflex&#8221; in now suddenly seeing how much of our data is public. There is also another post by Joshua Porter about the same problem. My take on this is below this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reflex&#8221; in now suddenly seeing how much of our data is public. There is also another post by Joshua Porter about the same problem. My take on this is below this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graco</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153183</link>
		<dc:creator>Graco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153183</guid>
		<description>About what control are you talking about in the API?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About what control are you talking about in the API?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ..:: ExaSpring&#8217;s Blog ::.. Web Hosting, Web Designing and SEO Blog ::.. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 5, 2008</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153180</link>
		<dc:creator>..:: ExaSpring&#8217;s Blog ::.. Web Hosting, Web Designing and SEO Blog ::.. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 5, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153180</guid>
		<description>[...]  The danger of social markers made public (more on the Social Graph API), Bokardo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  The danger of social markers made public (more on the Social Graph API), Bokardo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Baum</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153112</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Baum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153112</guid>
		<description>&#62; I’m reminded again by the age-old wisdom: “the best way to prevent secrets from getting out is to not have any in the first place”.

I agree Josh. People are going to get more familiar with answering a few not so simple questions... 

"Is a publicly exposed profile on the web right for me?"

"What do I have to hide?" - yikes

"What am I sharing and who am I sharing it with?" - First thing I am going to teach my kids.

Lets take for example publishing your Xbox Live activity to your Facebook profile. Say you call in sick or "work from home" one day. Your co-workers are friends on Facebook and see that you played Halo4 for 3 hours in the middle of the day. By default Xbox publishes your activity to your friends Live... if you play Halo with your boss. Oops. 

Private people can get away with more. The next wave of information literacy is going to be interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I’m reminded again by the age-old wisdom: “the best way to prevent secrets from getting out is to not have any in the first place”.</p>
<p>I agree Josh. People are going to get more familiar with answering a few not so simple questions&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;Is a publicly exposed profile on the web right for me?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;What do I have to hide?&#8221; - yikes</p>
<p>&#8220;What am I sharing and who am I sharing it with?&#8221; - First thing I am going to teach my kids.</p>
<p>Lets take for example publishing your Xbox Live activity to your Facebook profile. Say you call in sick or &#8220;work from home&#8221; one day. Your co-workers are friends on Facebook and see that you played Halo4 for 3 hours in the middle of the day. By default Xbox publishes your activity to your friends Live&#8230; if you play Halo with your boss. Oops. </p>
<p>Private people can get away with more. The next wave of information literacy is going to be interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big moves in social media tech - zumio</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153067</link>
		<dc:creator>Big moves in social media tech - zumio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153067</guid>
		<description>[...] write up from a technology perspective, and Joshua Porter has two posts looking at the benefits and potential dangers of the API, incl. reference to an excellent (though slightly alarmist, I feel) post from Dana Boyd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] write up from a technology perspective, and Joshua Porter has two posts looking at the benefits and potential dangers of the API, incl. reference to an excellent (though slightly alarmist, I feel) post from Dana Boyd [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leafar</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153050</link>
		<dc:creator>leafar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153050</guid>
		<description>Crap my illustrations pictures that appeared in the preview disappeared: &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ulikleafar/tags/wired/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here is the link to them &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crap my illustrations pictures that appeared in the preview disappeared: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ulikleafar/tags/wired/" rel="nofollow">here is the link to them </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leafar</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153049</link>
		<dc:creator>leafar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153049</guid>
		<description>Great, great post. I was also working on social markers but in a more random thoughts approach (I've speed up the publishing - &lt;a href="http://ulik.typepad.com/leafar/2008/02/social-markers.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;available here&lt;/a&gt;-)

This all discussion (like often when it comes to identity) reminds me of phrases that were in EPIC 2014. "It is the best of time, it is the worst of time" or At its best, EPIC is "a summary of the world — deeper, broader and more nuanced than anything ever available before ... but at its worst, and for too many, EPIC is merely a collection of trivia, much of it untrue."

Google API may be a social norm that constrains people (I think that's why danah is using forcing). Anyway, like with any technology we need to be alphabetize. Otherwise will be submitted to it. Identity education will be highly needed in school in a few years.

I'll invite you to take a look at &lt;a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&#38;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.internetactu.net%2F2008%2F02%2F01%2Fle-design-de-la-visibilite-un-essai-de-typologie-du-web-20%2F" rel="nofollow"&gt;this work on identity that shows 4 types of behaviors&lt;/a&gt;. I think what will happen is that it will become more difficult to manage the all system (I start to have troubles despite my knowledge) and therefore you will either do it fully or not (we come back to the secret metaphor) .

&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ulikleafar/2165209035/" title="Wired Cover - Get naked de [leafar], sur Flickr" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ulikleafar/2166005972/" title="Wired Cover - Rule the world de [leafar], sur Flickr" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

But that's our job! And I am trying with &lt;a href="http://www.u-lik.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;U.[lik]&lt;/a&gt; to push it to its best and making decision that enforces good  and easy management (@Lifson i do agree).  My "marxism" (small m) makes me believe that infrastructure plays a bigger role in determining behaviors that we always think. Therefore encouraging on demand chiaroscuro is probably the best solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, great post. I was also working on social markers but in a more random thoughts approach (I&#8217;ve speed up the publishing - <a href="http://ulik.typepad.com/leafar/2008/02/social-markers.html" rel="nofollow">available here</a>-)</p>
<p>This all discussion (like often when it comes to identity) reminds me of phrases that were in EPIC 2014. &#8220;It is the best of time, it is the worst of time&#8221; or At its best, EPIC is &#8220;a summary of the world — deeper, broader and more nuanced than anything ever available before &#8230; but at its worst, and for too many, EPIC is merely a collection of trivia, much of it untrue.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google API may be a social norm that constrains people (I think that&#8217;s why danah is using forcing). Anyway, like with any technology we need to be alphabetize. Otherwise will be submitted to it. Identity education will be highly needed in school in a few years.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll invite you to take a look at <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.internetactu.net%2F2008%2F02%2F01%2Fle-design-de-la-visibilite-un-essai-de-typologie-du-web-20%2F" rel="nofollow">this work on identity that shows 4 types of behaviors</a>. I think what will happen is that it will become more difficult to manage the all system (I start to have troubles despite my knowledge) and therefore you will either do it fully or not (we come back to the secret metaphor) .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ulikleafar/2165209035/" title="Wired Cover - Get naked de [leafar], sur Flickr" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ulikleafar/2166005972/" title="Wired Cover - Rule the world de [leafar], sur Flickr" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
<p>But that&#8217;s our job! And I am trying with <a href="http://www.u-lik.com" rel="nofollow">U.[lik]</a> to push it to its best and making decision that enforces good  and easy management (@Lifson i do agree).  My &#8220;marxism&#8221; (small m) makes me believe that infrastructure plays a bigger role in determining behaviors that we always think. Therefore encouraging on demand chiaroscuro is probably the best solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153045</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153045</guid>
		<description>Even without the explicit tagging, you could do this just of linkage. It's not that hard to see profiles all pointing at a particular blog and then understanding the blog belongs to those profiles. So if people are really concerned, well -- don't fill out the profiles period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even without the explicit tagging, you could do this just of linkage. It&#8217;s not that hard to see profiles all pointing at a particular blog and then understanding the blog belongs to those profiles. So if people are really concerned, well &#8212; don&#8217;t fill out the profiles period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Naked But Be Private About It - Covering All That's Social All the Web</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153023</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Naked But Be Private About It - Covering All That's Social All the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153023</guid>
		<description>[...] we want online but don&#8217;t be surprised when your information ends up publicly available. As Joshua Porter writes, &#8220;I’m reminded again by the age-old saying: &#8216;the best way to prevent secrets from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we want online but don&#8217;t be surprised when your information ends up publicly available. As Joshua Porter writes, &#8220;I’m reminded again by the age-old saying: &#8216;the best way to prevent secrets from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luigi Montanez</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153021</link>
		<dc:creator>Luigi Montanez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153021</guid>
		<description>I think the problem with the API boils down to user expectations. No one has expected this technology to exist, and when it suddenly does, people will get really creeped out.

Also, the API isn't just limited to relationships formalized by XFN and FOAF. Google will also use relationships on the more popular sites (MySpace being a prime example) that were not marked up. Where's the user control in that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem with the API boils down to user expectations. No one has expected this technology to exist, and when it suddenly does, people will get really creeped out.</p>
<p>Also, the API isn&#8217;t just limited to relationships formalized by XFN and FOAF. Google will also use relationships on the more popular sites (MySpace being a prime example) that were not marked up. Where&#8217;s the user control in that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lifson</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153020</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lifson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153020</guid>
		<description>To test the "creepy" sensor in your head, check out Spokeo.com. It'll suck in your email address book and then crawl the web for all the accounts your contacts use on various sites and aggregate that content into a newsfeed. I (unwittingly) discovered that my old college roommate uses StumbleUpon to bookmark his favorite pornographic images - an example of his mental model in discordance with reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To test the &#8220;creepy&#8221; sensor in your head, check out Spokeo.com. It&#8217;ll suck in your email address book and then crawl the web for all the accounts your contacts use on various sites and aggregate that content into a newsfeed. I (unwittingly) discovered that my old college roommate uses StumbleUpon to bookmark his favorite pornographic images - an example of his mental model in discordance with reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lifson</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153019</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lifson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153019</guid>
		<description>I can't help but be reminded of the outrage that sprung up when Facebook introduced the newsfeed. "What? That's public??". User groups springing up in revolt and revulsion. The solution? Provide great tools - with lots of entry points - for managing privacy. People will flinch when reality conflicts with their mental model, but that's not an excuse. 

As an aside, comprehensive yet easy to use privacy control user interfaces is a challenge that will need be solved again and again in the near future.  Some things you want to share with some friends, but not all things with all friends. Human relationships in the real world are complex, and revealing them via computer interfaces in a beautiful way will take some thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help but be reminded of the outrage that sprung up when Facebook introduced the newsfeed. &#8220;What? That&#8217;s public??&#8221;. User groups springing up in revolt and revulsion. The solution? Provide great tools - with lots of entry points - for managing privacy. People will flinch when reality conflicts with their mental model, but that&#8217;s not an excuse. </p>
<p>As an aside, comprehensive yet easy to use privacy control user interfaces is a challenge that will need be solved again and again in the near future.  Some things you want to share with some friends, but not all things with all friends. Human relationships in the real world are complex, and revealing them via computer interfaces in a beautiful way will take some thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Els</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153017</link>
		<dc:creator>Els</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/the-danger-of-social-markers-made-public/#comment-153017</guid>
		<description>&#62; I don’t know why she says that this is “forcing” people to expose their personal relationship information.

If I have a friend Tim on one site, and a friend Sarah on another, and they know each other on a third site and both publish their social graph, mine is being exposed too. The more people will use this API, the less privacy I will have, even if I'm not using it myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I don’t know why she says that this is “forcing” people to expose their personal relationship information.</p>
<p>If I have a friend Tim on one site, and a friend Sarah on another, and they know each other on a third site and both publish their social graph, mine is being exposed too. The more people will use this API, the less privacy I will have, even if I&#8217;m not using it myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
