<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why We Can&#8217;t Compare Folksonomies to Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bokardo.com/archives/why-we-cant-compare-folksonomies-to-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/why-we-cant-compare-folksonomies-to-search/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Social Web Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why We Canâ€™t Compare Folksonomies to Search... &#171; DDKU F2007 EKSAMENSBLOG</title>
		<link>http://bokardo.com/archives/why-we-cant-compare-folksonomies-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-142381</link>
		<dc:creator>Why We Canâ€™t Compare Folksonomies to Search... &#171; DDKU F2007 EKSAMENSBLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 13:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bokardo.com/archives/why-we-cant-compare-folksonomies-to-search-notes/#comment-142381</guid>
		<description>[...] Why We Canâ€™t Compare Folksonomies to&#160;Search&#8230;    Posted May 15, 2007    &#8220;&#8230;In Search, we have no idea who the results belong to before we get to them. They are simply the most relevant results to whatever words we type in. Highly useful, of course. But not Personal. In folksonomies, on the other hand, we get to discover content based on who is tagging it. This is powerful because now we can judge content in terms of who is tagging it, and not just how relevant it might be to some algorithm that doesnâ€™t take into account who-knows-who.&#8221; &#8230;find mere her! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why We Canâ€™t Compare Folksonomies to&nbsp;Search&#8230;    Posted May 15, 2007    &#8220;&#8230;In Search, we have no idea who the results belong to before we get to them. They are simply the most relevant results to whatever words we type in. Highly useful, of course. But not Personal. In folksonomies, on the other hand, we get to discover content based on who is tagging it. This is powerful because now we can judge content in terms of who is tagging it, and not just how relevant it might be to some algorithm that doesnâ€™t take into account who-knows-who.&#8221; &#8230;find mere her! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
