A good problem to have | Mike Industries
Mike Davidson rightly points out why iPhone/iPad apps are often better than their web counterparts.
It also amuses me when people talk about two things in particular with regard to the iPhone and iPad. First, how much better some companies’ iPhone apps are than their web sites, as if the company is somehow so much more gifted at creating iPhone apps than web pages. It feels better because it’s designed for you to do things quickly. Most web sites are actually not designed for speed of task completion at all. They are designed to maximize page views or at the very least, time on site (and hence, maximize revenue). ESPN.com doesn’t want you reading one story about the Mayweather/Mosley fight and then moving on with your day. They want you to read ten more stories after that, check your fantasy teams, and buy a Seahawks jersey. Mobile.espn.com, on the other hand, is more concerned with getting you in and out quickly because they know you have less tolerance for distraction and extraneous clicks when you’re on your phone. The second thing is when people talk about how great content looks in some of these iPad apps. Again, this is a reaction to the lack of distraction, not the tablet form factor.
via A good problem to have | Mike Industries.
Make them Care! - Struggling to communicate the value of your product or service? I'm writing a new book that shows you how to make people care about your product or service by clearly communicating the most important bits. For designers and marketers creating product web sites. Find out more.
Previous
Facebook Behaving Badly
Links to this Post
Comments
1. Web Design Surrey 5:50pm, Sat 15th, 2010
I’m in general agreement with you but there are some really dreadful iApps out there, and I think the finger swiping gui has a lot to do with a perception of a more futuristic or better designed app. Much of it is in the interface I think.