November 29th, 2006
Caterina of Flickr on Communication and Freedom
From a fascinating interview with Flickr’s Caterina Fake:
“We wanted to build a web-based game that would take the social web to the next level. When we realized it was the communication that was so important we changed direction”
Web apps are tools with which people communicate. Of course people do some task with them, but communication is key. With Flickr, of course, people communicate through photo sharing. With other tools, people communicate around other artifacts, like links, reviews, ratings, and other types of what Richard MacManus and I called “microcontent” in our Web 2.0 for Designers article (back when Web 2.0 didn’t mean everything under the sun).
Caterina continues:
‘The advance of the social web has thrust Flickr into the limelight, but the notion of sharing, discussing and commenting on pictures was far from original, which begs the question: Why has Flickr succeeded where similar sites have not?. “About 80 per cent of photos on Flickr are public: that level of social freedom wasn’t foreseen,” says Caterina. “When we started the company, there were dozens of other photosharing companies such as Shutterfly, but on those sites there was no such thing as a public photograph – it didn’t even exist as a concept – so the idea of something ‘public’ changed the whole idea of Flickr. By sharing images via tags, users are able to see stuff that’s going on all over the world – pictures of the London bombings and the Lebanese evacuation were up in minutes after the events.”‘
I find it interesting that Caterina uses the term “social freedom”. Certainly, having images public by default gets them to the 80% shared figure, but is it really freedom?
Perhaps it is, given that users can make them private when they want to. It also seems like an issue of control. People don’t mind having images public, as long as they can make them private when they want to. The insight to make them public by default is brilliant…but my guess is that it wouldn’t work as well if you weren’t able to choose.
Links to this Post
Comments
1. Andrew 12:52am, Thu 30th, 2006
“Why has Flickr succeeded where similar sites have not?”
Freedom, maybe, but also permalinks. What other photoservices provided simple unique URLs for their content?
2. Noah Brier 10:08am, Thu 30th, 2006
I also think Flickr’s success is at least in part due to their focus on the personal needs over social ones. At it’s core Flickr is a great place to store photos.
Come for your photos, stay for your friends’.
3. BillyWarhol 12:11am, Mon 11th, 2006
I think it’s the Flickr comments from fellow Flickr people that U meet from all over the world!
It’s Fantastic!
& simple & easy to use!
4. evbart 9:06am, Wed 13th, 2006
I agree with Noah. This same concept has been used to explain the success of del.icio.us right here in Bokardo in the “Del.icio.us Lessonâ€
http://bokardo.com/archives/learning-more-about-structured-blogging/
This is a pattern I am seeing again and again with different successful services. Any more examples out there?