January 5th, 2007

Continuous Computing: all social, all the time

by Joshua Porter  |   3 Comments  |  shortlink: http://bokardo.com/p/545

John Brockman, who publishes the well-known Edge newsletter, has an interesting prediction for social software as it goes mobile.

“WE WILL SEE migration of social applications as user-generated content moves to the WiFi environment. YouTube, MySpace and multi-user games will be available on hand-held devices, wherever you go. People will carry their digital assets much like their bacteria. Israeli tech guru Yossi Vardi calls it “continuous computing.”

I like that term: “continuous computing”. It’s catchy, and it suggests that computing is becoming a commonplace part of our lives. However, what we’re really doing isn’t “computing”, but simply socializing. We happen to be using computers to help us. That may sound like a small distinction, but I think it’s important to realize that although we’re using computers, they’re only enabling us to do more social things. We’re not being social because of computers…we’re wired to be social anyway.

It’s terms like this that put the technology above the activity, but we have to remember that the activity is spawning the technology in most cases. We can’t draw that line explicitly, however, as technology, as an enabler, makes new kinds of social interactions possible. Howard Rheingold’s smart mobs, for example, were enabled by mobile phones and other always-on technology.

Check out my latest project: Make them Care!, a book on designing great sign-up experiences. Get reminded when it's published.

Links to this Post

Comments

1.  Pauric 10:35am, Fri 5th, 2007

An ACD view where the activity is socialising. Here are a couple of links on whats holding this back

Blue Favour points out that mobile interface have a LONG way to go “Mobile providers want to charge you for everything under the sun. Adding an additional charge for something that looks broken and the most part not very useful, yet, is a hard pill to swallow.”
http://www.blueflavor.com/ed/mobile/ready_set_mobile.php

Adaptive path noted “consumers (in the US especially) don’t view phones as a valuable product in their own right.” and that “Apple is arguably the only company with enough product design savvy to alter their purchasing behavior”

And Danah Boyd quite righty states “An increased flow of information should not be confused with a deeper bond.”

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/17/business/wireless18.php