Previous
April 21st, 2006
On Browse
by Joshua Porter | 
6 Comments
Derek Powazek in The Wisdom of Browse:
“As the web matures, and we get better at developing member-driven media sites like Digg, we have to look beyond simplistic majority-rule popularity contests if we ever want to take on traditional editor-driven media. People are complicated, and we’re going to need complicated systems to really draw the wisdom out of the crowd.”
This follows hot on the heels of my recent post The One Crucial Idea of Web 2.0 as well as Ajit’s insight into collective intelligence, where he recast Web 2.0 principles underneath the umbrella of the Wisdom of Crowds. (collective intelligence) Alex has a nice writeup on this, too.
I’m confident that we’re seeing another insight from networked life here. The insight is that we can aggregate the wisdom of crowds, but only under certain circumstances and perhaps only for so long without evolving our systems. The recent Digg.com blowup is evidence that our systems need to adapt as their users adapt.
For those not familiar with the Wisdom of Crowds…
Previous
On MediationABOUT
Bokardo is the blog of Joshua Porter, a web designer/developer, researcher, and writer. I live in Newburyport, MA, USA.
Designing for the Social Web
Building a social web site or application? I wrote a book just for you!
Find out more or order from Peachpit or Amazon
Greatest Hits
- Five Principles to Design By
- The Del.icio.us Lesson
- Designing for the Social Web: The Usage Lifecycle
- Facebook's Brilliant but Evil Design
- Digg's Design Dilemma (Part II)
- 7 Reasons Why Web Apps Fail
- 7 More Reasons Why Web Apps Fail
- Which Movie to Watch? An Overview of Recommendation Systems
- Ugliness, Social Design, and the MySpace Lesson
Upcoming Speaking Events
- Voices that Matter Conference
Nashville, TN / Jun 10-13, 2008 - North Shore Web Geeks Meetup
Newburyport, MA / June 19, 2008 - d.Construct
Brighton Dome, UK / Sep 4-5, 2008 - Web 2.0 Expo
New York, NY / Sep 16-19, 2008
LATEST POSTS
- Free chapter of Designing for the Social Web available
- My Proposals for 2009 SXSW Talks
- Passionates
- Tripit Employee Pretending to be Disgruntled Dopplr User?
- Can Interfaces be Evil?
- Interface Design Principle: Let people learn more
- North Shore Web Geek Meetup this week, now with talks!
- Social design: from customer service to innovation
- Co-evolving
- Bill Gates upset with Windows Usability
Comments ( 6 Responses so far )
1. Tim on April 21st, 2006 (Comment) #
Also, perhaps, of general interest is James Surowiecki’s SXSW 2006 presentation, “The Wisdom of Crowds” -
http://server1.sxsw.com/2006/coverage/SXSW06.INT.20060311.WisdomOfCrowds.mp3
…a great listen.
2. Pete Cashmore on April 21st, 2006 (Comment) #
Interesting stuff. The thing we’ve got to remember about the Wisdom of Crowds is that decisions must be independent - Digg is emphatically not a Wisdom of Crowds system because users can see how others have voted. A single incorrect piece of info then leads to an info cascade, with everyone just copying those that went before them. I caught a site called SocialPicks yesterday that’s doing a similar thing with stocks.
3. Josh on April 21st, 2006 (Comment) #
Pete, I was just writing up that same point…some are saying that this means the end of “wisdom of crowds”, but according to the theory it is not.
When I read Surowieki’s book I was surprised at how strict the rules of a aggregable crowd are. Not all systems apply. I think that much effort has been put into the aggregation part, but not necessarily the independence part. (decentralization is usually built in)
Thanks for pointing that out…
4. David Swedlow on April 23rd, 2006 (Comment) #
While we’re mentioning criteria, don’t forget “diversity.”
So far, the web2.0 tools attract a fairly narrow and uniform band of the collective. Almost all of the aggregators harvest the madness of crowds rather than the wisdom. In fact, I believe this is a primary reason that a lot of people refute the validity of Surowiecki’s claims.
The Opposable Mind idea emphasizes this point; just like the value of the thumb is the opposablity factor, harnessing the opposability of minds is a goal we should be giving more attention.
5. Daniel Szuc on May 7th, 2006 (Comment) #
Hi Josh: passed this onto Jared and amazing stuff.
Jo Wong (http://www.apogeehk.com/jo.html) passed me an article from the ‘Asian Wall Street Journal’ on a site in China that allows people to come together when they want to negotiate a deal on the same product they are interested in buying e.g “the team purchase”.
May generate some interesting discussion on Brainsparks - http://www.51tuangou.com (available in Shanghai, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Suzhou). Don’t think there is an English site.
Are there similar services in the US?
Pingback: StrayPackets » Social Software or Glossy Magazine, It’s All A Conversation