October 23rd, 2006
In his plenary at UI11, Barry Schwartz, the author of The Paradox of Choice, made an interesting remark about how people make choices:
“People choose not on the basis of what’s most important, but on what’s easiest to evaluate”.
In other words, many times we don’t choose what’s best for us, we take the easy way out. This behavior is often called laziness, but I think it’s more than that. As Schwartz pointed out, we simply don’t have time for diligent research on all the choices we make. Most of the time, however, we imagine people making informed decisions. We imagine that if the information is there, then they’ll take advantage of it, consider it, and choose wisely.
We too easily forget that they’ve got 400 choices to make that day, this probably isn’t the most important one, and making it as fast as possible is a top priority. Instead of focusing in and really nailing that decision, the goal, instead, is an easy choice for a change.
It doesn’t take much to discover the ramifications of Schwartz’ observation. We choose politicians based on if we’ve heard of them before, not if they have the best record. We choose computers if we use the same kind at work, not if they are the best at helping us get stuff done. We choose movies that get high ratings, not if they’re the most important movie for us to see. Many times it’s OK if it’s not the best choice, but it’s the one we’re most comfortable with.
In interaction design, what’s easiest to evaluate gets attention. To-the-point copy. Efficient graphics. Strong page hierarchy. Easy-to-grasp interface elements. Etc…
This also helps to explain why we readily rely on our friends and family for help making decisions. It’s simply easier to do so, and in all probability will be a better decision than the one we would make casually, without much thought. It’s interesting to see how people make decisions in the face of intense choice: we’re really good at adapting and coming up with strategies that save time and energy.
ABOUT
Bokardo is the blog of Joshua Porter, a web designer/developer, researcher, and writer. I live in Newburyport, MA, USA.
Designing for the Social Web
Building a social web site or application? I wrote a book just for you!
Find out more or order from Peachpit or Amazon
Greatest Hits
Upcoming Speaking Events
LATEST POSTS
Written by Joshua Porter
Comments ( 11 Responses so far )
1. Daniel Szuc on October 24th, 2006 (Comment) #
Suggest that people are lazy and do look for easier & faster options.
Good take on this here: http://www.infodesign.com.au/articlespresentations/articles/humansadesignersguide.asp
Pingback: mobmash blog » Blog Archive » links for 2006-10-25
Pingback: Anne 2.0 » Blog Archive » links for 2006-10-24
2. Josh on October 25th, 2006 (Comment) #
Thanks for the pointer, Daniel. That’s a nice piece!
Pingback: Akkam’s Razor
Pingback: Are less choices the better? » Wize Blog : Product Research Simplified
3. lucas on October 26th, 2006 (Comment) #
Nice post Josh, It got me thinking about how choice applies to different e-services. Particularly the way that sites apply the collective wisdom of their users to shorten the decision-making process. Even ended up writing a blog about it: http://wize.com/blog/
Pingback: Juliette White » Recommendations
Pingback: tanjadebie.nl » De luie mensch
Pingback: tanjadebie.nl » Keuzestress
Pingback: The SuperSpade » Article » Voting & The Paradox of Choice