The Value of Self-expression

by Joshua Porter  |   December 20th, 2006  |  shortlink: http://bokardo.com/p/538

Nicholas Carr has a great post on Sharecropping the long tail

“One of the fundamental economic characteristics of Web 2.0 is the distribution of production into the hands of the many and the concentration of the economic rewards into the hands of the few. It’s a sharecropping system, but the sharecroppers are generally happy because their interest lies in self-expression or socializing, not in making money, and, besides, the economic value of each of their individual contributions is trivial. It’s only by aggregating those contributions on a massive scale – on a web scale – that the business becomes lucrative. To put it a different way, the sharecroppers operate happily in an attention economy while their overseers operate happily in a cash economy. In this view, the attention economy does not operate separately from the cash economy; it’s simply a means of creating cheap inputs for the cash economy.”

He nails the point: “sharecroppers are generally happy because their interest lies in self-expression”.

It really isn’t always about the money. Really. Many have characterized this as an unfair game, where the few were taking advantage of the many. But I think this is a better characterization.

However, that doesn’t mean there aren’t huge opportunities for innovators to bring some of that money back into the hands of users.

JPG Magazine and Threadless are two sites in particular that come to mind…they have interesting models that pay out cash to users who submit great stuff. I wrote about that here: Paying People for Voted-on Content

Make them Care! - Struggling to communicate the value of your product or service? I'm writing a new book that shows you how to make people care about your product or service by clearly communicating the most important bits. For designers and marketers creating product web sites. Find out more.

Links to this Post

Comments

1.  Sean Blanda 4:31pm, Sun 24th, 2006

That subject came up during the Netscape vs Digg debate. If I remember, Kevin Rose was blasted for not “sharing the love”. In a way, they’re right. User generated content is simply doing work for free.

2.  Pauric 9:47am, Tue 2nd, 2007

“However, that doesn’t mean there aren’t huge opportunities for innovators to bring some of that money back into the hands of users.”

such as Mechanical Turk and the products Amazon is building upon that system. I’m continuously impressed by their foresight in monetising the wisdom of the crowd.

3.  Tee 11:48am, Thu 25th, 2007

many greetings from Germany. good site

See You Tee

4.  Andy James 7:46am, Thu 1st, 2007

In a nutshell, I think that self expression should not come on the cost of other persons or things, anyway.

5.  Pozycjonowanie 7:53am, Wed 7th, 2007

“In a nutshell, I think that self expression should not come on the cost of other persons or things, anyway.” Andy – I fully agree with you btw. Thanks for great article. Greetings

6.  projektowanie stron www 11:50am, Wed 7th, 2007

In a nutshell, I think that self expression should not come on the cost of other persons or things, anyway.

7.  torben 11:43am, Fri 23rd, 2007

I appreciate your work very much thank you and best regards

8.  torrenty 5:15am, Sun 8th, 2007

Very good and great site with very good look and perfect information…i like it.

9.  deamon 8:20pm, Tue 10th, 2007

Nice site..good work..just keep it working