Previous
Next
July 17th, 2008
Tripit Employee Pretending to be Disgruntled Dopplr User?
by Joshua Porter | 
13 Comments
In On the Internet, people know if you’re a dog, my friend John Eckman details an interesting situation which underscores the importance of identity and revealing who you are in appropriate places on the Internet.
John wrote a great post the other day comparing some newly released features from the travel startup Dopplr with those of another travel startup, Tripit. Both services have become very well known in the last year and are converging in the same space: they’re increasingly becoming competitors in what might be called the social travel space. I actually use both services as examples in my talks…they are both doing some very innovative design. I even put Tripit screenshots in my book on social design.
Well, someone by the name of “Thomas” left a comment on John’s post that was pretty disparaging of Dopplr. This normally wouldn’t be a big deal, as every service has its detractors.
Except it appears that Thomas might actually work for Tripit. Just before he was going to publish the comment, John noticed that the machine Thomas commented from was called wall.tripitinc.com. While it is possible that this is an amazing coincidence, or that Thomas simply forgot to mention who he was, it’s unlikely. The comment is written from the voice of a customer trying out both services. (John’s post contains the full comment)
John tried to contact Thomas, but hasn’t heard back.
So, it appears that someone from Tripit is making negative comments about their competitor Dopplr without disclosing who they are. That is bad behavior, in the same way as if someone from Dopplr had come and made positive comments without disclosing who they are.
Previous
Can Interfaces be Evil?Next
PassionatesABOUT
Bokardo is the blog of Joshua Porter, a web designer/developer, researcher, and writer. I live in Newburyport, MA, USA.
Designing for the Social Web
Building a social web site or application? I wrote a book just for you!
Find out more or order from Peachpit or Amazon
Greatest Hits
- Five Principles to Design By
- The Del.icio.us Lesson
- Designing for the Social Web: The Usage Lifecycle
- Facebook's Brilliant but Evil Design
- Digg's Design Dilemma (Part II)
- 7 Reasons Why Web Apps Fail
- 7 More Reasons Why Web Apps Fail
- Which Movie to Watch? An Overview of Recommendation Systems
- Ugliness, Social Design, and the MySpace Lesson
Upcoming Speaking Events
- Voices that Matter Conference
Nashville, TN / Jun 10-13, 2008 - North Shore Web Geeks Meetup
Newburyport, MA / June 19, 2008 - d.Construct
Brighton Dome, UK / Sep 4-5, 2008 - Web 2.0 Expo
New York, NY / Sep 16-19, 2008
LATEST POSTS
- Free chapter of Designing for the Social Web available
- My Proposals for 2009 SXSW Talks
- Passionates
- Tripit Employee Pretending to be Disgruntled Dopplr User?
- Can Interfaces be Evil?
- Interface Design Principle: Let people learn more
- North Shore Web Geek Meetup this week, now with talks!
- Social design: from customer service to innovation
- Co-evolving
- Bill Gates upset with Windows Usability
Comments ( 13 Responses so far )
1. Scott Hintz on July 17th, 2008 (Comment) #
Hi, this is Scott Hintz, one of the co-founders of TripIt. You are correct that the comment you refer to on John Eckman’s blog was left by a TripIt employee who violated TripIt’s policies regarding such posts. We extend our sincerest apologies to John, his readers, and our friends at Dopplr.
We’ve posted a more detailed response on John’s blog here: http://www.openparenthesis.org/2008/07/15/dopplr-gets-email-twitter-sms-import
2. Josh on July 17th, 2008 (Comment) #
Thanks for the pointer Scott. I appreciate the way you handled this…good on you.
3. Buzzregog on July 17th, 2008 (Comment) #
This sort of thing really is no shock, look at any site selling something that has “customer” reviews. Mighty standup of the co-founder to own up though.
4. John Stack on July 18th, 2008 (Comment) #
It takes a good company with a good ethic to make a public apololgy. Now, taking that ethic and ensuring it is alive in the culture is the next step.
Joshua, I’m afraid by allowing unmoderated comments on blogs, replies in forums, its going to be a bigger problem. For example, I know someone who showed up on a porn site forum in this manner. Unfortunately, this person from a big operating system company who is trying to buy a search company can’t do a darned thing about it.
5. John Stack on July 18th, 2008 (Comment) #
I should hasten to add that I didn’t find it!!! He was self-googling to figure out some SEO stuff.
6. Ozel Dedektif on July 19th, 2008 (Comment) #
bad start but good finished, thank you
7. Serollah on July 19th, 2008 (Comment) #
I run a variety of local business sites which allow comments (all moderated) .. I have a hunch that many comments are actually being made by those with a competative interest in the success and/or failure of entities being commented on .. just a hunch, little hard evidence to back up my hunch .. although I do track IPs, etc ..
Pingback: TripIt vs Dopplr - least the blog got an apology! (Musings on travel ecommerce)
8. Jonathan on July 21st, 2008 (Comment) #
“That is bad behavior, in the same way as if someone from Dopplr had come and made positive comments without disclosing who they are.”
Here in Europe, it’s more than bad behaviour - it’s a criminal offence as of this year.
9. Ken on July 21st, 2008 (Comment) #
Joshua, excellent post to draw attention to the sordid underbelly of review posts on the Web.
My guess is that many very positive posts and many very negative posts are posted with some hidden agenda. When I read a review, I tend to discount the extremes and look for balanced opinions in the comments.
I wonder if this is something you address in your book, which is on my to-buy-soon list. In other words, how does a social web site avoid being manipulated by folks with a hidden agenda.
Pingback: Social Media Marketing Posts that are Igniting–8/1
10. Bruce P. Henry on August 2nd, 2008 (Comment) #
Josh - Can you check your spam filter for a comment I made (about spam curiously enough)?
I’m pretty sure it hit about 100% on the Bayesian filter for spam.
Funny how trying to describe spam makes you look like spam. Not so “funny haha” as “funny, I want to hit my head with a hammer.”
11. Mike Farley | Web Designer on August 21st, 2008 (Comment) #
There seems to be a lot of this going. A client of mine had some SCATHING reviews put up on various local entities such as merchantcircle, yahoo local, etc. Turns out they were all from a disgruntled employee. It’s becoming more and more important to setup alerts for your company and your name and pay attention to what’s being said. Google Alerts are not just for vanity anymore!