Previous
December 11th, 2006
Tim O’Reilly is returning to the definition he started with: Web 2.0 is the Web as Platform.
This is the definition that got me interested in Web 2.0 in the first place. It makes sense, easily contrasts with “desktop as platform”, and is accurate: we are seeing a tremendous platform move to the Web.
Unfortunately, sometime after Tim used this definition way back when, it went haywire and eventually ended up meaning nothing more than the Web itself. And really, that’s all it is…just a trend on the Web. In addition, O’Reilly went the VC route, focusing on business people while alienating technologists.
I don’t harbor negativity for someone who has a meme that helps people understand what’s going on. Ajax, web standards, SAAS, P2P, and other things are all figments of the imagination…they’re just other words for technologies that do certain things. And holding events is fine, too. People make the choice to come, let them come. Everybody has a flag to fly.
So, I applaud Tim returning to the original definition, after all this time. Don’t try to be everything to everyone.
However…it’s still not nearly as compact as it *could* be, and it’s not really a business revolution…it’s a technological trend.
In addition to “leveraging” this or that, how about focusing on building stuff that people love? Could that be part of all this? Or does it have to be about “network effects applied to user contribution”?
My guess is that if you focused on one and not the other, you’ll be much more successful than vice-versa.
Previous
New York Times Goes SocialABOUT
Bokardo is the blog of Joshua Porter, a web designer/developer, researcher, and writer. I live in Newburyport, MA, USA.
Designing for the Social Web
Building a social web site or application? I wrote a book just for you!
Find out more or order from Peachpit or Amazon
Greatest Hits
Upcoming Speaking Events
LATEST POSTS
Written by Joshua Porter
Comments ( 4 Responses so far )
Pingback: Dan’s Blog : Blog Archive : Web as Platform
1. Nensy Jones on January 25th, 2007 (Comment) #
Excerpt: From this vantage point, RSS evolves beyond simple publish and subscribe to become more akin to web services. The concept of a feed is extended to support both a diverse range of data and content types, and feeds can contain rich �payloads.� Furthermore, feeds gain the ability to expose well-formed methods providing the intelligent �glue logic� for building loosely coupled applications. Backed by two application examples, this blog presents a thesis of the key moving parts integral to the RSS platform and how they come together.
2. Ken Dryden on February 27th, 2007 (Comment) #
To set the scene, let’s consider what the essence of Web 2.0 is. Peter Merholz has been thinking about this: “The point isn’t the features, it’s the underlying philosophy of relinquishing control.” He pointed to Barnes & Noble’s failed attempt to replicate Amazon’s features and also cited Blockbuster trying to copy Netflix.
3. Atlanta Real Estate on July 2nd, 2008 (Comment) #
My guess is that if you focused on one and not the other, you’ll be much more successful than vice-versa.