Previous
August 17th, 2004
Reading Jeffrey Zeldman’s Silence and Noise the other day, I couldn’t help but think: why on earth do we talk about design so much? What is it about design that makes us interested in it enough to “rage about minutia”?
To help answer that question, I offer a simple observation of the amazing design-blogger phenomenon in which much of the raging takes place. My observation is this: in terms of designing usable and useful systems for other human beings, we are like children wondering at the sky.
We’ve got a ton of theories about what makes good design, but very little evidence to prove them right or wrong. We’ve got many people who claim to know the way, but few other people who are convinced they’re right. And we’ve got a few great designs that are measuring sticks for the rest of us, but remain elusive in terms of revealing how they’re great. Unfortunately, we’ve also got that nasty water animal the red herring to contend with: a plethora of design ideas that continually distract us from the one thing that truly matters: the use of our design by other human beings.
Forgive me for being pessimistic. I know how unhelpful it can be. However, I truly believe that humans learn by observing differences between two things, judging which one is better or worse, and acting on it. But if designers can’t see those differences or don’t know how to act on them, then they begin to focus on anything, everything, minutia. We focus on minutia when we think we’ve satisfied the bigger goals, when we don’t know what the bigger goals are, or when we don’t know enough about the bigger goals to make any decision concerning them. This is what I think is happening and part of what Zeldman is talking about.
Here’s something to try: Think of your favorite web site. (make sure that it’s one that you’ve at least visited twice in your lifetime)
Now, ask yourself: why on earth do I like this web site? What is different about this design from all the rest? What have the designers done that makes it such a special place for me? (In other words, look for the differences)
You might not be able to find them. It will probably be a good looking site, but there are many other good looking sites. It will probably be easy to navigate, but there are many other sites with good navigation. You will probably consider it usable, but perhaps not more so than other sites you’ve visited.
The difference between this site and others is that it fits your lifestyle, your context, your big goals. You’re a web designer, after all, and that is your concern. That is how you make a living (or want to). In some way this web site helps you do that, either directly or indirectly. It may simply provide the entertainment you need to get you through a hard work day. Or, it may be a site you like to shop on for web design books. It may be a site whose visual design you’re trying to emulate for your next project. It may even be a design-blogger site.
Whatever type of site it is, it helps you to be more of the person you want to be. No single design element, nor the technology with which the site is built, can do that. Instead, the design as a whole has succeeded in providing you with information that helps you be yourself. In many cases it won’t be crystal clear why this is so or how it is done. But it will be hidden somewhere in the details. In most cases though, I daresay, it will succeed for the same reason that others rage about minutia: because someone gives a damn.
ABOUT
Bokardo is a blog about interface design for social web sites and applications. I write about recommendation systems, identity, ratings, privacy, comments, profiles, tags, reputation, sharing, as well as the social psychology underlying our motivation to use (or not use) these things. If this sounds interesting to you, grab my RSS Feed. If you want to know more about me, check out my about page.
Designing for the Social Web
Building a social web site or application? I wrote a book just for you!
Find out more or order from Peachpit or Amazon
Greatest Hits
Upcoming Speaking Events
LATEST POSTS
Written by Joshua Porter
Find me:
Comments ( 3 Responses so far )
1. Keith on August 18th, 2004 (Comment) #
I ponder the same questions, even as I’m fully engaged in a debate about fixed vs. liquid designs.
It’s a silly fight, no one can seem to point out any real evidence for or against either side, yet there it is again.
The devil is in the details and because there are so many designers out there who are passionate about thier craft, and who want to get it right, there will inevitably be some heated discussion.
I don’t see anything wrong with it. Sure it’s noise to some, but for others it might cause an ephiphany or make someone realise that a user IS important.
You bring up some interesting things to ponder. But I’ve got an even more interesting question for you:
Why do we have such a knee-jerk reaction and drop everything and and listen when Zeldman speaks?

2. Josh on August 18th, 2004 (Comment) #
Keith,
I can’t speak for anybody else, but I listen to what Zeldman has to say because it’s usually ahead of the game.
In this case, his post caused me to ask a question, and I went about trying to answer it. I hope it wasn’t too knee-jerky.
That said, I don’t think Zeldman’s got all the answers. He’s only got answers for his clients, and a few of those he can generalize for the rest of us. In the end design is not about following one designer or their ideas: it’s about following your users.
By the way, I read asterisk for the same reason, and I’ve posted comments there.
If as designers we can articulate what our experiences are, we’ll help each other out and create good designs for those who need them. That’s a big reason I enjoy designing and blogging.
3. Jarrod on August 18th, 2004 (Comment) #
I think you hit the nail on the head there, Josh. There’s less and less articulating about our experiences as designers, and it’s becoming more and more focused on what the big-wigs are up to. Not that they don’t deserve the spotlight for their hard and cutting-edge work much of the time, but do we really need to be spending as much time as we are comparing how Mr. Zeldman, Mr. Cedarholm, Mr. Robinson and Mr. Bowman name the various divs that make up their page?
I miss the write-ups like Doug Bowman did for his CSS ZenGarden entry, I miss the discussions of the pros and cons of various image replacement techniques…It seems less and less like the design-blogging community are interested in these things, and moreso in the minutia mentioned above. I think that’s why Scrivs was recognized and got a following so quickly, because he writes those long articles that are both interesting and thought-provoking, and deal with issues that we’re going to face from time to time.
I do believe that Zeldman is listened to so much because he’s been around longer than most of us, and he’s done a great job the whole way through. When you read his posts, like the Silence and Noise one, you know instantly where he’s coming from, and I think that for people such as myself, he gives us someone to really look up to.