December 12th, 2007
Before anybody claims that I am an Amazon fanboy (as I reference Amazon *a lot* in my talks), let me just say that in addition to some really great design they also have areas to improve on. Here’s a particularly baffling one: wish list sharing.
Sharing is crucial in social design. It allows people to share your application/service/web site with others in a way that you as the designer can’t. What other people say about you is an order of magnitude more powerful than what you can say about you.
If you don’t have smooth, easy process for sharing you are hampering the growth of your app. Sure, people will share to some extent on their own, but why force them to? When someone sends a personal, relevant message sharing something, the recipient will take notice. Make that as easy as possible.
Here is the sharing form for Amazon’s wish lists. It’s a typical sharing form: a bit of explanatory text, an email field, and a message.

But for some reason, and I can’t for the life of me figure out why, Amazon doesn’t let you edit the message. And they really should, as the message suffers from several problems:
This bizarre design choice on Amazon makes the act of sharing a wish list impersonal, thereby killing most of the effect. Not only do you lose the identity of the sender, but you can’t set any context for the email at all. You can’t say “Hey Mom, here’s the Wii game I was talking about” or “Hey Grandma, instead of sending me ugly sweatpants of the local sports team send me these books”. After reading this message several times I keep thinking “who would ever send this?”. What context would this fit?
Simply put, any advantage you could gain by allowing people to send a wish list in their own identity is lost. As Charles Eames said: “The details are not the details. They make the design.”
Update: A member of the Amazon Wish List team says:
“The text of this email has been locked temporarily for security reasons until we can implement a better solution.
The timing before the holidays is quite unfortunate.”
(editor’s note: drop me a line if you find this type of post useful…I have *lots* of these examples)
ABOUT
Bokardo is the blog of Joshua Porter, a web designer/developer, researcher, and writer. I live in Newburyport, MA, USA.
Designing for the Social Web
Building a social web site or application? I wrote a book just for you!
Find out more or order from Peachpit or Amazon
Greatest Hits
Upcoming Speaking Events
LATEST POSTS
Written by Joshua Porter
Comments ( 17 Responses so far )
1. Dennis Eusebio on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
Man that really is some awkward copy.
2. Steve on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
It used to be possible to edit the text, last year at least. Used it again yesterday and sent it out like this only because noone would think that I actually wrote this.
3. Ingrid on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
I saw this last week on Amazon.de (Germany). This must be a bug! I wonder why they haven’t figured it out. I sent my wishlist on and followed it up with a personal e-mail.
4. Michael Zuschlag on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
“Sounds like it was written by someone desperate to make a sale.”
Maybe that’s why they did it. Amazon’s goal is to get people to buy their things. This can be accomplished by getting people to use wish lists and to create their own for others to use. I bet they committeed this copy and decided it would get them more sales than what an average user would write, and maybe that’s even true. An underlying assumption of UX is that what’s good for the user is good for the company, but sometimes it doesn’t quite mesh. Gift-giving is about fostering human relationships, not about buying as much as possible from Amazon.
5. Josh on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
Michael, I suppose your theory is possible, but I really doubt that Amazon “decided it would get them more sales than what an average user would write”. That would be completely inconsistent with the rest of the site, which leverages social interactions from the people themselves to provide value to others.
Your point about gift-giving is right on. But I would like to hear more about “An underlying assumption of UX is that what’s good for the user is good for the company, but sometimes it doesn’t quite mesh”…
6. Juliette on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
It’s something that they’ve changed in the last three months - you always used to be able to edit the text, but I was really shocked a couple of days when I couldn’t and I wasn’t sure if it was a bug or deliberate. I had to e-mail the URL myself instead!
7. Amazon Wish List team member on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
The text of this email has been locked temporarily for security reasons until we can implement a better solution.
The timing before the holidays is quite unfortunate.
8. ANDY on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
Couldn’t you just send it to yourself and edit thet text and forward along the more critical message details / links?
9. Michael Zuschlag on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
Re: “what’s good for the user is good for the company… doesn’t quite mesh.” I mean that this may be an example of a conflict between the user’s goals and the company’s goals. The default copy may be good for getting people to use Amazon for gift-buying, but it’s not so good for fostering relationships.
10. David Garcia on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
Just the other day I needed to send my wish list to several people. I disliked the copy so much that I emailed the link to myself then just forwarded the link, sans poor message. I looked for a place where I can just copy then paste the link, but didn’t see it anywhere. Probably just missed it, I’d imagine they wouldn’t leave out something so basic yet crucial. You know, the features for the power users that can not only tie their own shoes but also send email.
When I saw their form letter, I guessed immediately that it was for security reasons. Other large web sites have gotten around the security-issue aspect in so many ways.
11. Scott Markwell on December 12th, 2007 (Comment) #
It isn’t terribly hard to click, “Tell people about this list” to copy and paste the unique url into an email. I tend to prefer this method as it actually comes from my e-mail address. The idea of giving Amazon.com random family/friend e-mail addresses simply to send them a link is a bit excessive and may ruffle their privacy concerns. The bigger issue is defining how we share information, if only there was some sort of uniform resource locator I could give to someone over IM….
12. Runescape on December 13th, 2007 (Comment) #
Cool idea and your friends dont’t have to ask you “what do you want for you Happy Birthday?” I have only to make this list of your wish
13. Cem Sertoglu on December 13th, 2007 (Comment) #
Good point, although most web users have by now learned to ignore the heading copy on emails like these… You assume it’s pre-filled by the site.
14. Chris - boxedup.com on December 13th, 2007 (Comment) #
Hey Joshua
Chris from boxedup.com here. We’re a start-up in the shopping/wish/gift list space (we’re all about connecting people and the products they love). We’ve got a dual focus on the personal and social utility in tracking, and interacting around, the things that you want to get from anywhere on the web (so it’s basically social bookmarking meets social networking for the stuff you want and are into).
Not going to pretend that we’ve nailed everything yet from an experience perspective, but we’re getting there (we’re pushing improvements out fairly continuously, including iterating the design as we understand more about interaction opportunities and needs - drag and drop to re-order lists coming tomorrow!).
As far as invites are concerned, we’ve got a more minimalist, but still generic, message that goes out right now, so room for improvement here in terms of personalising the message (but that’ll be coming). The standard message performs fairly well in getting the desired result (i.e. people signing up in response), but since it’s a message that often arrives in your inbox out of the blue a generic message doesn’t give the service the all-important personal context (or maximise conversion potential). So thanks for reinforcing this point!
There are obviously lots of sharing and communication opportunities in this type of proposition, whether it’s on-site comments, messaging or content sharing, and it’s certainly something that we think about a lot, and look to embed throughout every level of the service. We’ve definitely found that people love using the communication tools to share thoughts and comments.
Anyway, thanks for the post, and for all the good thought-provoking stuff that you write on Bokardo!
15. Pete on December 13th, 2007 (Comment) #
I wish the wishlists had a unique url (visible on the page)that you could forward to people. That way when people ask me what i want for christmas i can include all my wishlists in one email. Also there is a chance that spam filters may put amazon’s mail in the bin, and then I’d cry on christmas day.
16. Damon on December 13th, 2007 (Comment) #
The copy seems to assume that the wish list e-mail was unsolicited. I can see how sending one out in that context would be awkward, so any examples (editable!) are good. But looking at a solicited scenario (you just spoke to some family / friends) who asked what’s on your list, it becomes REALLY awkward… there is no reason for that kind of an introduction.
17. peter on January 4th, 2008 (Comment) #
I agree, big mistake. I also had trouble over the holidays finding people’s gift lists online. Before finding the link was clear and easy, but i spent alot of time just trying to find where to lookup my friend’s list. Another usability mistake.