Yahoo Movies and the Law of Web Page Sprawl

by Joshua Porter  |   4 Comments

Got a fantastic, unsolicited email from my father-in-law, who while getting frustrated with Yahoo Movies coined a new law: the Law of web page sprawl.

Yahoo Movies

Dear Josh,

http://movies.yahoo.com/

If you go to Yahoo.com and click on movies (left side of screen) you come to the above web-page.

The annoying thing is it took 19 seconds for this page to completely appear. Nothing wrong with my computer. Just with the page - there is tooooooo much there.

Anyway, I just thought I would send this to you as you mentioned how a cluttered web-page seems to grow even more cluttered by virtue of the ‘LAW OF WEB-PAGE SPRAWL’. And Yahoo is a perfect example of this ‘effect’. For instance, they totally screwed up their TV-listings page also.

The YAHOO! TV page used to load quickly and you could find out program information quickly and easily. So they changed it. Now it is so ungainly and slow, I have stopped using it.

‘Media-brainiacs’ at the biggest companies dictate content based on advertising over convenience….in other words….the heck with the user.

After all, he’ll say, “LIVE WITH IT”. I shouldn’t be too surprised. Media, radio and TV for example, is always trying ways to squeeze in ever more advertising.

How much do they think people will put up with???? I think that this is the question I have begun to ask myself. The media keeps pushing the limits of advertising and programming (expanding the former and squeezing the latter) …. is there any limit?

The web is now ‘THE MEDIA’ and as such (at Yahoo at least) they’ve been exploring this question - i.e. “WHAT IS THE LIMIT TO THE USERS AD TOLERANCE AND MAXIMIZING ADVERTISING REVENUES?”

I know that they are doing this. So sometimes just being aware of it is annoying in itself. At other times I just sigh and say, “LIVE WITH IT”.

I have to hand it to them. In recent years the ad-man and ad-woman has me convinced that he is informing me - at the same time he is pitching his product. If I am not mistaken, the snake oil salesman used a similar tactic.

Ed

Again, this was unsolicited. How long did he spend writing this? How many times does his frustration have to hit the boiling point before he writes this? My guess is that he’s been frustrated for a while.

Now, this is why social media (and the design of it) is so important. In most cases, an email like this dies on the vine, its recipient acknowledges the difficulty but moves on. In some cases it makes its way onto the web, as it has here. In a small number of those cases, someone from Yahoo might actually notice it. In a small number of those cases, it might actually be discussed at Yahoo. In a small number of those cases Yahoo might actually do something about it.

Here’s the major point: The person’s frustration is already there. We have evidence of it. It has little to do with what exposure the email gets. Whether it dies on the vine or whether Jerry Yang (CEO of Yahoo) emails him directly to follow up, my father-in-law is extremely frustrated. If nobody read the email, he’s upset. If it makes the front page of the NYTimes, he’s still upset. That’s the core issue…there is frustration out there…is anybody listening closely enough to do something about it?

The action of a company would depend on how many people are having this conversation. Are other people getting annoyed at the long download times and advertising on the Yahoo Movies page? Or is this an isolated incident? If it is an isolated incident then Yahoo should not do anything about it. But if this is a trend…

Notice that my father-in-law doesn’t use the TV listings on Yahoo anymore?

Yahoo has an advantage here…Yahoo already knows how many people are saying things like this because their own search engine software is scouring the web even as we speak. Or so I assume…

But what about companies who are being written about but don’t know it? What about companies who are annoying people like Yahoo is annoying my father-in-law and the only time they’ll even have an idea is when that person cancels the relationship? That’s the power of designing tools like blogs that enable customers to speak. The answer is already out there.

Just waiting to be found.

Comments ( 4 Responses so far )

1.  Fred on December 9th, 2007 (Comment) #

“That’s the core issue…there is frustration out there…is anybody listening closely enough to do something about it?”

Your father-in-law is right: Yahoo’s business model is built on the principle of maximizing advertising space to the limit of the user’s ad tolerance. The reason they build new properties is to generate sprawl on which to put ads. Sure people are listening closely, but what are you going to do, throw out the basic business assumption of the whole company?

2.  Max on December 9th, 2007 (Comment) #

I know this post was made primarily with the idea of exploring how companies deal have a conversation with customers like your father, but it’s interesting to consider the design angle that is leading to the frustration.

Fred correctly points out that advertising is crucial to the business model of sites like Yahoo, which means clean, user friendly design is (by implication) sacrificed. But I think this goes beyond advertising — it’s the whole Web 2.0 streamlining of websites. Yahoo has also revamped their mail interface, and while I’m no luddite, I’m surprised at how unappealing I find it.

There are other sites like this — sites that are ostensibly cleaner, better designed, better looking, with more customization possible, moveable widgets, etc — but that ultimately end up confusing and alienating visitors and long time users.

In the case of the movie page your father is referring to, one glaring faux pas is that the “My Movies” and search options are small and relatively hidden up top, and in Safari, the search box doesn’t even display properly (making it difficult if not impossible to type in). So if you want to get away from all the clutter, the page doesn’t even give you an escape.

I’m sure you’ve come up with a catchphrase, Josh, for this phenomenon of clean, contemporary design that is actually an illusion and which masks the relative difficulty of navigation and use of the site’s options — I’ll have to go through more of your posts to find out if you have.

3.  Josh on December 9th, 2007 (Comment) #

No, Max, I haven’t. But you’re right….I should!

Thanks for your thoughtful response, guys…you bring up an interesting point that this sort of design might be in Yahoo’s DNA.

Will mull that one over…one angle I was going to go with this was the idea that you are either a content producer(MTV) or a content aggregator(Google)…and Yahoo, with its advertising relationships, seems to want to do both. That might also be part of this frustration.

4.  Mark on December 9th, 2007 (Comment) #

You know, my first response to reading this article was to feel Yahoo’s pain. I’m a developer at a small private company, and one of the main parts of our website is a storefront that the user can customize to sell their content. We tried to make the storefronts be everything to everybody and needless to say, that didn’t work - they are bug riddled and difficult to maintain. So now as developers we’re trying to correct the problems, but we simply can’t get it done fast enough. We hear the customer’s complaints, but there are only so many developers to go around to handle the problem, and from the business side we’re pressured to get things working and then start on the next great idea that will make us money, even if we know just getting things working will lead to them likely breaking again.

It’s a balancing act. Even when you hear the frustration of your customers screaming at you, once something is in place it is almost impossible to reverse it or improve it without at least several months time. Companies simple do not move at the same pace as customers, so inevitably someone is going to be unhappy. I don’t have the answer to this, other than to have the business tell the customer sorry, we’re doing the best we can, and then try to back those words up with action as soon as possible.

Add Your Comment

Accepted tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Preview...

If your comment contains links, or if it is your destiny, your comment may not show up immediately. I'll approve it as soon as I can. (I delete dozens of comment spams per day)

Get updated when someone posts a comment: Comment Feed


ABOUT

Bokardo is the blog of Joshua Porter, a web designer/developer, researcher, and writer. I live in Newburyport, MA, USA.

WHAT IS SOCIAL DESIGN?

Social design is design that focuses on the social lives of users. It deals with the activities, behaviors, and motivations of people who work and play together through software interfaces. It is built on the observation that many of the decisions we make are greatly affected by those we surround ourselves with in our social lives: our family, friends, and colleagues. Exploring our motivations and how to design interfaces to support them is what the Bokardo blog is all about.

Designing for the Social Web

Building a social web site or application? I wrote a book just for you!

designing for the social web

Find out more or order from Peachpit or Amazon

Upcoming Speaking Events