Give people something to copy

by Joshua Porter  |   May 14th, 2007  |  shortlink: http://bokardo.com/p/611

Quick blogging tip: When someone writes an incredibly flattering post about you, don’t immediately link to the flattering post. Why?

Because many times when someone does this, the link can actually be hurtful because it’s not a real link to quality content. The author, the flattered one, often pretends they’re really writing about the rest of the post and not the part about themselves. But they’re really writing to point out that someone likes them.

I’m not immune to this. I’ve done it too. But its completely obvious. In some cases, someone will actually point to someone else’s post and not mention that there is a part of the post about them…pretending to ignore it. That is so weird though, when you go read the post and wonder…does the person think I’m an idiot?

Instead, wait until that person writes something really cool, and then link to that. In this case, Mark Earls, whose blog is Herd, the hidden truth about who we are, has written an insightful post about how humans copy each other so much: Copying is Good.

He says:

“Whatever our culture (and of course our own minds) tell us, human beings are copying machines. We do it all the time from the moment we are born to the day we die. Copying is a much more important form of learning for humans than it is for other primates.

One of the plausible explanations for this is that human beings are born c.12months premature into much more sophisticated social lives than any other primate; this requires a lot of learning and it seems easiest to get the thing roughly down first of all and correct things (if necessary) later on. Copying is an ideal strategy for this kind of “stupid” infant; it’s just something that stays switched on through our adult lives, also.”

His resulting design suggestion? “Give people something to copy”.

Now this is social design! This is how to take advantage of what people already do socially and make tools to help support it.

If you link immediately and don’t wait, you’re actually diluting the value of your link because people unfamiliar with the blog will think that’s what they write about or the only reason you linked to them is because they write flattering stuff. Instead, you owe it to your readers to link to the cream of their crop.

And, by the way, this is how to keep a high pagerank. Always obsess over what you link to. Make sure its good and adds to the conversation! And, in terms of full disclosure, mention that they wrote something very flattering about you. ;)

You need to show your readers why their blog is a good read…so save your links for a post that pushes the discussion forward.

Make them Care! - Struggling to communicate the value of your product or service? I'm writing a new book that shows you how to make people care about your product or service by clearly communicating the most important bits. For designers and marketers creating product web sites. Find out more.

Links to this Post

Comments

1.  ~bc 3:34pm, Mon 14th, 2007

But it is OK to Twitter about flattering posts. Just so everyone’s clear on the ettiquette. It’s human to be a little proud that someone likes your work. Otherwise, people will start to wonder. :-)

2.  Josh 3:36pm, Mon 14th, 2007

Right, absolutely…Twitter is perfect for that.

3.  David 4:19pm, Mon 14th, 2007

Right on again Josh. This is not something I have thought about much, but I like to link to other people’s stuff – I will be more conscious to make sure it’s the kind of stuff I want my readers to read (not just read my summary or snippet).

4.  Svetlana Gladkova 6:27am, Tue 15th, 2007

The post sounds absolutely right to me but there’s one BUT. How do you think it relates to submitting the blog (not this exact flattering post and only if the blog is actually good) to StumbleUpon or making it your favorite on Technorati? Actually I always do such things because I know that I can bring some additional thousand of visitors to this blog via SU and I am actually willing to help the blogger. Can it also be considered inappropriate?

5.  Julia 1:18pm, Tue 22nd, 2007