October 31st, 2007
Chris Anderson, editor in chief at Wired, has published a list of 329 email addresses that have been used to send him PR SPAM in the last month. He says he’s fed up:
“I’ve had it. I get more than 300 emails a day and my problem isn’t spam, it’s PR people. Lazy flacks send press releases to the Editor in Chief of Wired because they can’t be bothered to find out who on my staff, if anyone, might actually be interested in what they’re pitching.”
Being someone who gets a small amount of PR SPAM (~10 a day), I certainly sympathize with Anderson’s move here. It’s tiresome to spend valuable time weeding through emails that at first seem addressed to you, until you realize they’re simply sent to a huge list of bloggers. They’re not personal messages. They’re generic. Some PR folks even lie and say “I’ve been reading your blog and I love everything you write, your child is beautiful, and may your family receive honor forever…etc…etc”. But after that it quickly becomes clear that they never refer to my blog specifically and they never tell me anything related to the topics I write about. It’s not informing. It’s insulting.
Here’s an example of one I got the other day. It’s not nearly as bad as some, but just as useless. It starts out:
Joshua,
Hope you had a great weekend. I wanted to give you a heads up on this great partnership StreetAdvisor is announcing this week with Australia’s top real estate website realestate.com.au. REA has tapped StreetAdvisor to give homebuyers, owners, renters and real estate agents with a great tool to help find the right property, in the right neighborhood.
And my question is: “How is this in any way valuable to me or my audience?”. No doubt Anderson asks a similar question when he gets SPAM.
Anderson’s response is a good lesson in a common problem with Identity on the Web. When Identity is known, behavior becomes civilized very quickly. When identity is not known, or not public as the case may be, behavior turns ugly.
When PR people send these broadcast emails, their identity is known to the receiver, but only the receiver. They rely on that fact to try to encourage the receiver to publish something about them (be it in Wired or on Bokardo). They take the chance that you’ll be fooled into thinking their information is worth publishing, while also realizing that if not you’ll probably ignore it. This last bit is crucial…the spammers expect certain behavior from the receivers…most spammers know that a large majority of people will simply ignore what they send.
But Anderson took the matter into his own hands and made the identities of those PR spammers public, and thereby changed the normal rules of engagement.
Now, he’s opened up their behavior for public scrutiny. He’s allowing other people to offer their judgment. The effect that this will have is that those email addresses will probably be ignored or blacklisted even more often than they currently are. He’s hoping that by making an example of these people they’ll change their behavior in the future.
You’ll notice the commenters on Anderson’s piece are divided over this. There are people who are cheering him, saying “way to go!”. There are also people (presumably people who are on the list) who are saying “get over yourself”.
This is public ridicule at its best, and it’s one of the few ways to combat private solicitation. When Anderson makes a formerly private relationship (one he didn’t want anyway) public, he knows that the public will label this as bad behavior.
Most large-scale spammers aren’t trying to create a real relationship, so they don’t have to use real email addresses. But PR people usually have to use their real addresses because they do want a real relationship with the receiver. Little do they realize how annoying their solicitation is…perhaps Anderson’s move will wizen them up.
ABOUT
Bokardo is the blog of Joshua Porter, a web designer/developer, researcher, and writer. I live in Newburyport, MA, USA.
Designing for the Social Web
Building a social web site or application? I wrote a book just for you!
Find out more or order from Peachpit or Amazon
Greatest Hits
Upcoming Speaking Events
LATEST POSTS
Written by Joshua Porter
Comments ( 6 Responses so far )
1. idont on October 31st, 2007 (Comment) #
It is the same issue everybody is facing. He is lucky.. his spam is more focused than our.
On my website’s main email (info@…) I get over 2′000 spams per day for so stupid stuff…. (I never subscribed to any mailing list, porn service, etc.)
2. mvlib on November 1st, 2007 (Comment) #
Just use gmail to cut down spam emails.
P.S. Joshua, consider about filtering spam in blog comments.
3. epc on November 1st, 2007 (Comment) #
It’s funny to see people who’ve sent a PR blast to 10,000 people complain about their email addresses being publicised.
My work email address was briefly listed in every page on ibm.com in the 1990s. When I left I was receiving over 500 emails a day. I hesitate to label them all spam because many were from people attempting to sell something specifically to me, but I defy any one person to handle 500 unsolicited emails a day (I can’t imagine what it would be today).
4. j. on November 3rd, 2007 (Comment) #
Hi Joshua.
PR spammers are spammers. Should we really care if they send us “info” instead of “pills”?
5. Dwayne on November 4th, 2007 (Comment) #
The problem with publishing a list like this is that spammer often do not use their own email addresses and so people that are completely unrelated to the spammer get hit with the black listing.
While Mr. Anderson may be a unique case where most of the people spamming him really use their own email address, I don’t think that would be the case with most of us.
6. Asi on November 5th, 2007 (Comment) #
I’m not sure this is really effective, unfortunately . In order for the name and shame list to hurt it has to be personal and should have been rather shorter as too many people on the list remain somewhat anonymous…
A.