Why Not a Paid Version of Gmail?
Could someone answer why Google doesn’t provide a paid version of Gmail?
It would seem to make sense on several levels:
- Revenue from something other than Advertising. Google’s recent stock dip suggests that ad revenue might not grow like mad forever.
- It would make their free email service look better.
- Some people (executives, usually) just like to pay for stuff. Don’t know why…
- It could possibly pay for the incredible hosting costs of supporting Gmail.
- Their investors might sleep a little sounder.
Could someone answer why Google doesn’t provide a paid version of Gmail?
UPDATE: Now that Yahoo and AOL want to charge for guaranteed delivery of email, Steve Gillmor sees a version of Gmail Plus on the horizon, but he doesn’t think they’ll charge for it.
2nd UPDATE: Google releases another feature for Gmail: integration with GTalk. This is not one that we considered, so the question becomes, does this change anything?
It would seem to make sense on several levels:
- Revenue from something other than Advertising. Google’s recent stock dip suggests that ad revenue might not grow like mad forever.
- It would make their free email service look better.
- Some people (executives, usually) just like to pay for stuff. Don’t know why…
- It could possibly pay for the incredible hosting costs of supporting Gmail.
- Their investors might sleep a little sounder.
Alternatively, it might not make sense on several levels:
- Is Google privy to information that Yahoo’s paid-for email isn’t getting traction?
- What exactly would be the paid-for features? (Yahoo’s: 2GB storage, spamguard, no ads, and large attachments)
- Are people so used to free email apps that nobody would buy?
- They think that ads will grow forever and don’t need to worry about charging for software.
I use Gmail as a backup system for various things: it isn’t my primary mail application. I actually interact with the interface very little, but when I do I’m generally happy with it. I’ve heard that most folks are very happy with it, as well with Yahoo’s new email service, which I haven’t played with very much.
But if Google is serious about taking value away from the desktop, it would seem that they would want to get revenue from web-based, networked applications (as well as getting people used to the idea). I’m a strong believer that if you can create something that people truly want, then you’ll have no problems getting money in return. And it seems like Gmail has a lot of goodwill out there…why aren’t they innovating and providing a pay-for email service? It’s not like paid-for services don’t work on the Web. Just about everyone I know has a Flickr Pro account…
Previous
Next