Previous
Next
February 22nd, 2006
Here’s the slide deck for a talk I gave on Web 2.0 for the Greater Boston Chapter of the ACM, a non-profit educational and scientific society of computer professionals in the Boston area.
Web 2.0 - Leveraging the Network (2.74 MB pdf)
In the talk I spoke about how Web 2.0 companies distinguish themselves by leveraging the network of which they are a part. Brittanica, for example, has had a web site for quite some time and were slow to leverage the network in any particular way. Wikipedia, on the other hand, exists only because they used the available network to improve their contents communally. And Wikipedia, of course, is a much, much more popular site.
As in my last talk: Web 2.0 for the Rest of Us (which includes a podcast), I started down the road toward Web 2.0 from the standpoint of those Web companies who have excelled: Google, Yahoo, Amazon, and eBay. They obviously know more about succeeding online than anybody else, and have become so successful so fast that we often take them for granted, even though they are barely a decade old. So, I find it particularly useful to ask: What makes them so special? What have they done that others haven’t? And I find myself coming back to the same answer over and over: they know how to leverage the network. From Google’s pagerank algorithm to the APIs of eBay and Amazon to the movie ratings on Yahoo, these companies know how to harness the collective activity and intelligence of people to make their services better.
For those who want only the quick and dirty (without the pretty pictures), here are the talking points:
I would appreciate any and all feedback, as I’ll be giving this talk in the future and would like to improve upon it in any way that I can.
Previous
On FaithNext
On PassiveABOUT
Bokardo is the blog of Joshua Porter, a web designer/developer, researcher, and writer. I live in Newburyport, MA, USA.
Designing for the Social Web
Building a social web site or application? I wrote a book just for you!
Find out more or order from Peachpit or Amazon
Greatest Hits
Upcoming Speaking Events
LATEST POSTS
Written by Joshua Porter
Comments ( 16 Responses so far )
1. James Corbett on February 22nd, 2006 (Comment) #
Excellent Josh - there are some truly eye-opening points in this for a usability newbie like me. It’ll take me some time to absorb all the information behind these bullet points….
2. Josh on February 22nd, 2006 (Comment) #
Thanks, James!
By the way, if anyone is confused by a slide and/or the site snapshot that follows it, please feel free to leave a comment or email me.
There is indeed a story behind each talking point, and in the talk I went into each one, but didn’t write out all the bullet points on the slide. I find that writing out all the bullet points becomes distracting for me as a presenter, as I tend to read them instead of telling the story.
3. Francis Wu on February 22nd, 2006 (Comment) #
Excellent list, Josh. Nearly every single point reminds me where all these dot-coms have gone wrong. I’ve worked for a few so I couldn’t help myself from muttering “I told you so” throughout the list :P.
4. Anne Zelenka on February 22nd, 2006 (Comment) #
Great stuff. My favorite is #20, “personal value precedes network value.” I don’t get #7, “recommendation systems are a forced move.”
5. Josh on February 23rd, 2006 (Comment) #
Yes, Anne, without any context #7 doesn’t make much sense…
What I mean by recommendation systems being a forced move is that we(users) need help sorting through the myriad of choices that we have. It’s not enough to simply have everything available, like we do at Amazon, because we’re still up against the paradox of choice.
So Amazon, in an effort to more easily distinguish between product offerings and help users make better choices, has gone completely down the recommendations path (my screenshot is of my personal Amazon page). And we’re seeing this trend across everything: music (Pandora, Last.fm, Yahoo, and iTunes), movies (Netflix, Blockbuster), dating services, social software, TV shows (live.com), memetrackers, reading lists, etc… just about everything that we have to choose from will get recommended to us based on a variety of criteria.
And it’s a forced move because these services will get lost in the shuffle unless they can provide valuable recommendations.
Pingback: Jeff Bridgforth » The Del.icio.us Lesson
Pingback: Alex Barnett blog : Response to the Attention Problem
6. peterme on February 25th, 2006 (Comment) #
http://www.peterme.com/archives/000438.html
7. Josh on February 26th, 2006 (Comment) #
Right on, Peter. And Flickr is a great example of a company who figured out how to provide tools to leverage the network. Designers could do much worse than to study what they’ve done…
8. Michael Bayler on March 11th, 2006 (Comment) #
Really like these points Josh. Two more that I like to muse on are that, in 2.0, tagging is the new culture, and, perhaps more profoundly, all behavior is programming.
MB
9. Josh on March 14th, 2006 (Comment) #
Michael…say more about “behavior is programming”. I’m not sure I get it…but it sounds intriguing.
Pingback: onbrain.wordpress.com » Blog Archive » link 2006-03-20
Pingback: The Smoking Foot » Blog Archive » They know how to leverage the network.
Pingback: Anne 2.0 » Gone to the Beach
Pingback: meish dot org » links for 2006-02-24
Pingback: meish dot org » links for 2006-02-23