Web 2.0 Talk – Leveraging the Network

by Joshua Porter  |   16 Comments  |  shortlink: http://bokardo.com/p/360

Here’s the slide deck for a talk I gave on Web 2.0 for the Greater Boston Chapter of the ACM, a non-profit educational and scientific society of computer professionals in the Boston area.

Web 2.0 – Leveraging the Network (2.74 MB pdf)

In the talk I spoke about how Web 2.0 companies distinguish themselves by leveraging the network of which they are a part. Brittanica, for example, has had a web site for quite some time and were slow to leverage the network in any particular way. Wikipedia, on the other hand, exists only because they used the available network to improve their contents communally. And Wikipedia, of course, is a much, much more popular site.

As in my last talk: Web 2.0 for the Rest of Us (which includes a podcast), I started down the road toward Web 2.0 from the standpoint of those Web companies who have excelled: Google, Yahoo, Amazon, and eBay. They obviously know more about succeeding online than anybody else, and have become so successful so fast that we often take them for granted, even though they are barely a decade old. So, I find it particularly useful to ask: What makes them so special? What have they done that others haven’t? And I find myself coming back to the same answer over and over: they know how to leverage the network. From Google’s pagerank algorithm to the APIs of eBay and Amazon to the movie ratings on Yahoo, these companies know how to harness the collective activity and intelligence of people to make their services better.

For those who want only the quick and dirty (without the pretty pictures), here are the talking points:

  1. The home page is no longer the most important page on your site.
  2. The information architecture that people use to find your content is, increasingly, not yours.
  3. Each feature added to an application is more to think about – for everyone.
  4. Folksonomies are a way for users to map their own, familiar vocabulary to your alien one.
  5. Words are the currency of the Web. Spend the most time on your words.
  6. Seducible moments are those increasingly rare moments when you can talk to your users in an appropriate context.
  7. Recommendation systems are a forced move.
  8. Users want control.
  9. Users appreciate tools that help them make their own well-informed decisions.
  10. The best software models human behavior.
  11. Links model how users value content, and are only the start…
  12. Sometimes it is easier to design for yourself than others.
  13. There is always an opportunity for a better interface to data.
  14. All things being equal, faster interfaces allow for more innovation.
  15. Most people are willing to trade their personal information for good service.
  16. As choices grow, so does the importance of learnability.
  17. Redesigns are dead.
  18. Network effects are rare, and killer.
  19. Network effects work in the opposite way for teams building software.
  20. Personal value precedes network value
  21. People rarely do things for the “good of the network”
  22. Del.icio.us, though providing very cool tagging features, is mostly about a single person remembering items for later.
  23. “The accretion of tiny marvels can numb us to the arrival of the stupendous”

I would appreciate any and all feedback, as I’ll be giving this talk in the future and would like to improve upon it in any way that I can.

Check out my latest project: Make them Care!, a book on designing great sign-up experiences. Get reminded when it's published.

Links to this Post

Comments

1.  James Corbett 10:24am, Wed 22nd, 2006

Excellent Josh – there are some truly eye-opening points in this for a usability newbie like me. It’ll take me some time to absorb all the information behind these bullet points….

2.  Josh 10:45am, Wed 22nd, 2006

Thanks, James!

By the way, if anyone is confused by a slide and/or the site snapshot that follows it, please feel free to leave a comment or email me.

There is indeed a story behind each talking point, and in the talk I went into each one, but didn’t write out all the bullet points on the slide. I find that writing out all the bullet points becomes distracting for me as a presenter, as I tend to read them instead of telling the story.

3.  Francis Wu 1:52pm, Wed 22nd, 2006

Excellent list, Josh. Nearly every single point reminds me where all these dot-coms have gone wrong. I’ve worked for a few so I couldn’t help myself from muttering “I told you so” throughout the list :P .

4.  Anne Zelenka 8:05pm, Wed 22nd, 2006

Great stuff. My favorite is #20, “personal value precedes network value.” I don’t get #7, “recommendation systems are a forced move.”

5.  Josh 6:55am, Thu 23rd, 2006

Yes, Anne, without any context #7 doesn’t make much sense…

What I mean by recommendation systems being a forced move is that we(users) need help sorting through the myriad of choices that we have. It’s not enough to simply have everything available, like we do at Amazon, because we’re still up against the paradox of choice.

So Amazon, in an effort to more easily distinguish between product offerings and help users make better choices, has gone completely down the recommendations path (my screenshot is of my personal Amazon page). And we’re seeing this trend across everything: music (Pandora, Last.fm, Yahoo, and iTunes), movies (Netflix, Blockbuster), dating services, social software, TV shows (live.com), memetrackers, reading lists, etc… just about everything that we have to choose from will get recommended to us based on a variety of criteria.

And it’s a forced move because these services will get lost in the shuffle unless they can provide valuable recommendations.

6.  peterme 9:33pm, Sat 25th, 2006

Those sites that truly succeed on the web do so because of a fundamental appreciation of what “the network” brings. Amazon, eBay, and Google being the biggest, shiniest examples. They get that the network, with its constituent elements of people doing things, and through those activities, somehow connecting to each other (whether it’s direct, as in items on eBay, or indirect, as in different people buying the same product on Amazon, linking to the same page in Google), they get that that connection is meaningful, exceedingly meaningful, and if you can leverage that behavior, you can provide an experience orders of magnitude more interesting than when you ignore that connectedness.

http://www.peterme.com/archives/000438.html

7.  Josh 9:47am, Sun 26th, 2006

Right on, Peter. And Flickr is a great example of a company who figured out how to provide tools to leverage the network. Designers could do much worse than to study what they’ve done…

8.  Michael Bayler 4:36pm, Sat 11th, 2006

Really like these points Josh. Two more that I like to muse on are that, in 2.0, tagging is the new culture, and, perhaps more profoundly, all behavior is programming. :-) MB

9.  Josh 9:20am, Tue 14th, 2006

Michael…say more about “behavior is programming”. I’m not sure I get it…but it sounds intriguing.